IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p347-d200981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitability Assessment of Legal Regulation of Chemical Concentrations According to Vapor Pressure and Damage Radius

Author

Listed:
  • Hyo Eun Lee

    (Department of Health Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Seok J. Yoon

    (Department of Health Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Jong-Ryeul Sohn

    (Department of Health Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Da-An Huh

    (Department of Health Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Seok-Won Jang

    (Environmental Research Complex, National Institute of Environmental Research, Hwangyeong-ro 42 Seo-gu, Incheon 22689, Korea)

  • Kyong Whan Moon

    (Department of Health Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

Many chemicals used in the industrial field present risks, which differ depending on their chemical properties. Additionally, their various physicochemical properties change considerably with concentration. Many chemicals are used in customized processes in factories in the form of different aqueous solutions. The Korean Chemicals Control Act evaluates “hazardous chemicals”, describes their risks to the public, and regulates their concentration. To prepare against chemical accidents, factories construct models of potential damage radius, which is greatly influenced by a chemical’s vapor pressure. This study selected substances with widely varying vapor pressures (hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, aqueous ammonia, and hydrogen peroxide) and compared the results of different modeling programs (KORA, ALOHA, PHAST, and RMP*Comp) for various aqueous solution concentrations. The results showed that damage radius and vapor pressure increased similarly for each substance. Damage radius was negligible at low concentrations for all substances studied. Damage radius of ammonia solution increased with vapor pressure. Hydrogen fluoride is not found in aqueous solution at concentrations of less than 37%, and hydrogen peroxide does not show a large damage radius at low concentrations. However, the Chemicals Control Act strictly regulates hydrogen fluoride concentration beginning at 1%, hydrogen chloride and aqueous ammonia at 10%, and hydrogen peroxide at 6%. To effectively prepare against chemical accidents, we must examine scientifically-based, suitable regulations based on physicochemical properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyo Eun Lee & Seok J. Yoon & Jong-Ryeul Sohn & Da-An Huh & Seok-Won Jang & Kyong Whan Moon, 2019. "Suitability Assessment of Legal Regulation of Chemical Concentrations According to Vapor Pressure and Damage Radius," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:347-:d:200981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minjun Kim & Gi-Hyoug Cho, 2020. "Influence of Evacuation Policy on Clearance Time under Large-Scale Chemical Accident: An Agent-Based Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Mun Seob Ahn & Hyo Eun Lee & Kwang Soo Cheon & Huoung Gi Joo & Ochang Chemical Safety Community & Bu-Soon Son, 2020. "Feasibility Evaluation of Designated Quantities for Chemicals Requiring Preparation for Accidents in the Korean Chemical Accident Prevention System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:347-:d:200981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.