IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i2p194-d196859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Condon

    (Frailty Service, Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Rd, Galway City H91 YR71, Ireland
    Physiotherapy Department, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork City T12 DC4A, Ireland)

  • Edel Mannion

    (Frailty Service, Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Rd, Galway City H91 YR71, Ireland)

  • D. William Molloy

    (Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarrs Hospital, Douglas road, Cork City T12 XH60, Ireland)

  • Rónán O’Caoimh

    (Frailty Service, Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Rd, Galway City H91 YR71, Ireland
    Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarrs Hospital, Douglas road, Cork City T12 XH60, Ireland
    Clinical Research Facility Galway, National University of Ireland, Galway, Costello Rd, Galway City H91 V4AY, Ireland)

Abstract

Incontinence is common and associated with adverse outcomes. There are insufficient point prevalence data for incontinence in hospitals. We evaluated the prevalence of urinary (UI) and faecal incontinence (FI) and their predictors among inpatients in an acute university hospital on a single day. Continence status was recorded using the modified Barthel Index (BI). Baseline characteristics, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and ward type were recorded. In all, 435 patients were assessed, median age 72 ± 23 years and 53% were male. The median CFS score was 5 ± 3. The point prevalence of UI was 26% versus 11% for FI. While UI and FI increased with age, to 35.2% and 21.1% respectively for those ≥85, age was not an independent predictor. Incontinence also increased with frailty; CFS scores were independently associated with both UI ( p = 0.006) and FI ( p = 0.03), though baseline continence status was the strongest predictor. Patients on orthopaedic wards had the highest prevalence of incontinence. Continence assessments were available for only 11 (2%) patients. UI and FI are common conditions affecting inpatients; point prevalence increases with age and frailty status. Despite this, few patients receive comprehensive continence assessments. More awareness of its high prevalence is required to ensure incontinence is adequately managed in hospitals.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Condon & Edel Mannion & D. William Molloy & Rónán O’Caoimh, 2019. "Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-8, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:194-:d:196859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/194/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/194/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabin Zürcher & Susi Saxer & René Schwendimann, 2011. "Urinary Incontinence in Hospitalised Elderly Patients: Do Nurses Recognise and Manage the Problem?," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2011, pages 1-5, April.
    2. Gregor John & Claire Bardini & Christophe Combescure & Patrick Dällenbach, 2016. "Urinary Incontinence as a Predictor of Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rónán O’Caoimh & Laura Morrison & Maria Costello & Antoinette Flannery & Cliona Small & Liam O’Reilly & Laura Heffernan & Edel Mannion & Ruairi Waters & Shaun O’Keeffe, 2024. "Frailty in an Adult Acute Hospital Population: Predictors, Prevalence, and Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Marta Morales-Puerto & María Ruiz-Díaz & Marta Aranda-Gallardo & José Miguel Morales-Asencio & Purificación Alcalá-Gutiérrez & José Antonio Rodríguez-Montalvo & Álvaro León-Campos & Silvia García-Mayo, 2022. "Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Adverse Events in Multimorbid Patients in Emergency and Hospitalisation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shinje Moon & Hye Soo Chung & Yoon Jung Kim & Sung Jin Kim & Ohseong Kwon & Young Goo Lee & Jae Myung Yu & Sung Tae Cho, 2021. "The impact of urinary incontinence on falls: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:194-:d:196859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.