IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i2p187-d196589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Non-Liner Decision Model for Green Crowdfunding Project Success: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jinbi Yang

    (School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Libo Liu

    (Department of Business, Technology and Entrepreneurship, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia)

  • Chunxiao Yin

    (College of Computer & Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)

Abstract

Green growth and environmental sustainability have become a significant focus in today’s living. We believe that green crowdfunding project can make an important contribution to the creation and evaluation of environmental systems. This study aims to investigate the determinants of green crowdfunding project success. Contrary to the linear relationship in previous literature, we propose a non-liner decision model that includes three determinants, funds pledge, goal setting, and project duration to predict project success. The quantitative approach method was employed. We crawl data on 1389 green crowdfunding projects from Tencent Lejuan, a crowdfunding platform in China. By using ordinary least square method to conduct data analysis, we find that the effect of goal setting on project success is non-linear as low and moderate levels of goal setting are not always likely to have a significant impact on project success, but the presence of a higher goal is likely to exert a positive effect on project success. Moreover, results show that the effect of project duration on project success is non-linear as short and moderate levels of duration is not always certain to have significant impact on project success, but the presence of a long duration is likely to exert a positive effect on project success. This study has implications for fund-seekers for green crowdfunding projects and managers of crowdfunding platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinbi Yang & Libo Liu & Chunxiao Yin, 2019. "A Non-Liner Decision Model for Green Crowdfunding Project Success: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:187-:d:196589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lagazio, Corrado & Querci, Francesca, 2018. "Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 318-324.
    2. Thomas Clauss & Robert J. Breitenecker & Sascha Kraus & Alexander Brem & Chris Richter, 2018. "Directing the wisdom of the crowd: the importance of social interaction among founders and the crowd during crowdfunding campaigns," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 709-729, November.
    3. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Yuting Chen & Rong Zhang & Bin Liu, 2017. "Joint Decisions on Production and Pricing with Strategic Consumers for Green Crowdfunding Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Gordon Burtch & Anindya Ghose & Sunil Wattal, 2013. "An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Contribution Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 499-519, September.
    6. Sarah Smith & Frank Windmeijer & Edmund Wright, 2015. "Peer Effects in Charitable Giving: Evidence from the (Running) Field," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 125(585), pages 1053-1071, June.
    7. Thies, Ferdinand & Wessel, Michael, 2014. "The Circular Effects of Popularity Information and Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumer Decision-Making: Evidence from a Crowdfunding Platform," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 65161, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    8. Juanjuan Zhang & Peng Liu, 2012. "Rational Herding in Microloan Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 892-912, May.
    9. Thies, Ferdinand & Wessel, Michael, 2014. "The Circular Effects of Popularity Information and Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumer Decision-Making: Evidence from a Crowdfunding Platform," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 65238, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tang, Xiaobo & Yao, Xingyuan & Dai, Ruyi & Wang, Qian, 2024. "Does green matter for crowdfunding? International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Yaokuang Li & Junjuan Du, 2020. "What drives the rapid achievement of a funding target in crowdfunding? Evidence from China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(6), pages 269-277.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Niemand & Sascha Kraus & Martin Angerer & Ferdinand Thies & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2019. "More is not always better—non-linear effects in crowdfunding," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Thomas Clauss & Thomas Niemand & Sascha Kraus & Patrick Schnetzer & Alexander Brem, 2019. "Increasing Crowdfunding Success Through Social Media: The Importance Of Reach And Utilisation In Reward-Based Crowdfunding," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 1-30, May.
    3. Salahaldin, Linda & Angerer, Martin & Kraus, Sascha & Trabelsi, Donia, 2019. "A duration-based model of crowdfunding project choice," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 404-410.
    4. Nikolaus Lipusch & Dominik Dellermann & Ulrich Bretschneider & Philipp Ebel & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2020. "Designing for Crowdfunding Co-creation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 483-499, December.
    5. Felipe, Israel José dos Santos & Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley & Leal, Cristiana Cerqueira & Braun Santos, Danilo, 2022. "Reward crowdfunding campaigns: Time-to-success analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-228.
    6. Gordon Burtch & Anindya Ghose & Sunil Wattal, 2016. "Secret Admirers: An Empirical Examination of Information Hiding and Contribution Dynamics in Online Crowdfunding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 478-496, September.
    7. Xiaobei Liang & Xiaojuan Hu & Jiang Jiang, 2020. "Research on the Effects of Information Description on Crowdfunding Success within a Sustainable Economy—The Perspective of Information Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-36, January.
    8. Zvilichovsky, David & Danziger, Shai & Steinhart, Yael, 2018. "Making-the-Product-Happen: A Driver of Crowdfunding Participation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 81-93.
    9. Philipp B. Cornelius & Bilal Gokpinar, 2020. "The Role of Customer Investor Involvement in Crowdfunding Success," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 452-472, January.
    10. Ajay Agrawal & Christian Catalini & Avi Goldfarb & Hong Luo, 2018. "Slack Time and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1056-1073, December.
    11. Yuho Chung & Yiwei Li & Jianmin Jia, 2021. "Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: the role of backer networks in crowdfunding," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 925-946, September.
    12. Chan, C.S. Richard & Parhankangas, Annaleena & Sahaym, Arvin & Oo, Pyayt, 2020. "Bellwether and the herd? Unpacking the u-shaped relationship between prior funding and subsequent contributions in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    13. Zaggl, Michael A. & Block, Joern, 2019. "Do small funding amounts lead to reverse herding? A field experiment in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    14. Parker, Simon C., 2014. "Crowdfunding, cascades and informed investors," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 432-435.
    15. Yan Lin & Wai Fong Boh, 2020. "How different Are crowdfunders? Examining archetypes of crowdfunders," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1357-1370, November.
    16. Mingchun Chen & Zhiying Liu & Chaoliang Ma & Xiuyuan Gong, 2021. "A distinctive early bird price in reward-based crowdfunding," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 347-370, June.
    17. BELLEFLAMME Paul, & LAMBERT Thomas, & SCHWIENBACHER Armin,, 2019. "Crowdfunding dynamics," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2019014, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    18. Paolo Crosetto & Tobias Regner, 2014. "Crowdfunding: Determinants of success and funding dynamics," Jena Economics Research Papers 2014-035, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    19. Xiaoyu Li & Jiahong Yuan & Yan Shi & Zilai Sun & Junhu Ruan, 2020. "Emerging Trends and Innovation Modes of Internet Finance—Results from Co-Word and Co-Citation Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Renwick, Matthew J. & Mossialos, Elias, 2017. "Crowdfunding our health: Economic risks and benefits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 48-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:187-:d:196589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.