IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i24p5040-d296486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Studies of Muslim Females’ Perceptions of Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators

Author

Listed:
  • David Kahan

    (School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, ENS Building 315, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-7251, USA)

Abstract

Muslim women’s perceptions of cultural, religious, and secular determinants of physical activity have been studied for many years, with information typically acquired through focus groups or interviews. Multiple reviews synthesizing the research have been published, however, individual studies have not been scrutinized for their quality/rigor. Therefore, I critically appraised the quality of the body of qualitative research studies that utilized focus groups to identify Muslim women’s perceptions of physical activity barriers and facilitators. I utilized 26 items from the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) to assess the quality of 56 papers published between 1987 and 2016. Using crosstabulations, I also examined associations between paper quality (low vs. high) and binary categorical variables for impact factor, maximum paper length allowed, publication year, and database the paper was indexed. Overall, papers averaged only 10.5 of 26 COREQ reporting criteria and only two out of 26 items were reported in more than 75% of the papers. Paper quality was not associated with impact factor and length. High quality papers were more likely published more recently (i.e., 2011 or later) and in journals indexed in the PubMed database compared to low quality papers. There is contention among qualitative researchers about standardizing reporting criteria, and while the trend in quality appears to be improving, journal reviewers and editors ought to hold authors to greater accountability in reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • David Kahan, 2019. "Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Studies of Muslim Females’ Perceptions of Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5040-:d:296486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5040/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birol Akkuş & Tom Postmes & Katherine Stroebe, 2017. "Community Collectivism: A social dynamic approach to conceptualizing culture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Whitney Babakus Curry & Joan L. Duda & Janice L. Thompson, 2015. "Perceived and Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time among South Asian Women in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jelena Reste & Tija Zvagule & Natalja Kurjane & Zanna Martinsone & Inese Martinsone & Anita Seile & Ivars Vanadzins, 2015. "Wrist Hypothermia Related to Continuous Work with a Computer Mouse: A Digital Infrared Imaging Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Kamalesh C. Dey & Julia K. Zakrzewski-Fruer & Lindsey R. Smith & Rebecca L. Jones & Daniel P. Bailey, 2021. "The Prevalence of Daily Sedentary Time in South Asian Adults: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5040-:d:296486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.