Author
Listed:
- Mei Cai
(School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)
- Yiming Wang
(School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)
- Qian Luo
(Business School, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)
- Guo Wei
(Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, NC 28372, USA)
Abstract
Postpartum depression (PPD), a severe form of clinical depression, is a serious social problem. Fortunately, most women with PPD are likely to recover if the symptoms are recognized and treated promptly. We designed two test data and six classifiers based on 586 questionnaires collected from a county in North Carolina from 2002 to 2005. We used the C4.5 decision tree (DT) algorithm to form decision trees to predict the degree of PPD. Our study established the roles of attributes of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS), and devised the rules for classifying PPD using factor analysis based on the participants’ scores on the PDSS questionnaires. The six classifiers discard the use of PDSS Total and Short Total and make extensive use of demographic attributes contained in the PDSS questionnaires. Our research provided some insightful results. When using the short form to detect PPD, demographic information can be instructive. An analysis of the decision trees established the preferred sequence of attributes of the short form of PDSS. The most important attribute set was determined, which should make PPD prediction more efficient. Our research hopes to improve early recognition of PPD, especially when information or time is limited, and help mothers obtain timely professional medical diagnosis and follow-up treatments to minimize the harm to families and societies.
Suggested Citation
Mei Cai & Yiming Wang & Qian Luo & Guo Wei, 2019.
"Factor Analysis of the Prediction of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5025-:d:296205
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5025-:d:296205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.