Author
Listed:
- Cathy Bailey
(Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Coach Lane Campus, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)
- Dominic Aitken
(School of Architecture Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)
- Gemma Wilson
(Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Coach Lane Campus, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)
- Philip Hodgson
(Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Coach Lane Campus, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)
- Barbara Douglas
(Elders Council of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK)
- Rachael Docking
(Centre for Ageing Better, National Charity, London EC1V 4AD, UK)
Abstract
Older people, even those living with long-term conditions or poor mobility, can be supported to live well at home, through adapting their home to meet changing need. Installing home adaptations, from grab rails to walk in shower rooms, is cost effective, may prevent falls, reduce social isolation and improve self confidence. Despite austerity cuts to public spending, the UK government increased home adaptations’ funding. However, not much is known about older people’s experiences and understanding of acquiring and living with home adaptations and uptake of home adaptations could be improved. Using wearable camera and face to face interview data, this qualitative study explored a diverse group of older people’s retrospective experiences ( n = 30). Focus group discussions were also carried out with a wide range of professionals involved in the provision of home adaptations ( n = 39). Findings suggest people may delay having adaptations, because of perceived stigmatising associations with decline and vulnerability. As delaying the installation of home adaptations until crisis point is known to reduce their effectiveness, such associations need to be challenged.
Suggested Citation
Cathy Bailey & Dominic Aitken & Gemma Wilson & Philip Hodgson & Barbara Douglas & Rachael Docking, 2019.
"“What? That’s for Old People, that.” Home Adaptations, Ageing and Stigmatisation: A Qualitative Inquiry,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:4989-:d:295509
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:4989-:d:295509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.