IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i23p4847-d293229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Has the Efficiency of China’s Healthcare System Improved after Healthcare Reform? A Network Data Envelopment Analysis and Tobit Regression Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Guangwen Gong

    (School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
    Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Yingchun Chen

    (School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
    Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Hongxia Gao

    (School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
    Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Dai Su

    (School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
    Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Jingjing Chang

    (School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
    Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China)

Abstract

Background: A healthcare system refers to a typical network production system. Network data envelopment analysis (DEA) show an advantage than traditional DEA in measure the efficiency of healthcare systems. This paper utilized network data envelopment analysis to evaluate the overall and two substage efficiencies of China’s healthcare system in each of its province after the implementation of the healthcare reform. Tobit regression was performed to analyze the factors that affect the overall efficiency of healthcare systems in the provinces of China. Methods: Network DEA were obtained on MaxDEA 7.0 software, and the results of Tobit regression analysis were obtained on StataSE 15 software. The data for this study were acquired from the China health statistics yearbook (2009–2018) and official websites of databases of Chinese national bureau. Results: Tobit regression reveals that regions and government health expenditure effect the efficiency of the healthcare system in a positive way: the number of high education enrollment per 100,000 inhabitants, the number of public hospital, and social health expenditure effect the efficiency of healthcare system were negative. Conclusion: Some provincial overall efficiency has fluctuating increased, while other provincial has fluctuating decreased, and the average overall efficiency scores were fluctuations increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangwen Gong & Yingchun Chen & Hongxia Gao & Dai Su & Jingjing Chang, 2019. "Has the Efficiency of China’s Healthcare System Improved after Healthcare Reform? A Network Data Envelopment Analysis and Tobit Regression Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4847-:d:293229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4847/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4847/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob Novignon & Solomon Olakojo & Justice Nonvignon, 2012. "The effects of public and private health care expenditure on health status in sub-Saharan Africa: new evidence from panel data analysis," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Kao, Chiang, 2009. "Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 949-962, February.
    3. Ng, Ying Chu, 2011. "The productive efficiency of Chinese hospitals," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 428-439, September.
    4. Mirhedayatian, Seyed Mostafa & Azadi, Majid & Farzipoor Saen, Reza, 2014. "A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 544-554.
    5. Dong, Keyong, 2009. "Medical insurance system evolution in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 591-597, December.
    6. Xuedan You & Yasuki Kobayashi, 2011. "Determinants of out-of-pocket health expenditure in China," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 39-49, January.
    7. Hao Zhang & Huimei Hu & Christina Wu & Hai Yu & Hengjin Dong, 2015. "Impact of China's Public Hospital Reform on Healthcare Expenditures and Utilization: A Case Study in ZJ Province," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Kao, Chiang & Hwang, Shiuh-Nan, 2008. "Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 418-429, February.
    9. Fusco, Marco & Buja, Alessandra & Piergentili, Paolo & Golfetto, Maria Teresa & Serafin, Gianni & Gallo, Silvia & Dalla Barba, Livio & Baldo, Vincenzo, 2016. "Individual and hospital-related determinants of potentially inappropriate admissions emerging from administrative records," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1304-1312.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junfeng Lu & Hui Yang & Leiyu Shi & Xia Sheng & Yongjun Huo & Ruqing Liu & Ruwei Hu, 2023. "Associations between Primary Healthcare Experiences and Glycemic Control Status in Patients with Diabetes: Results from the Greater Bay Area Study, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Yusi Cheng & Xuejie Bai & Yung‐Ho Chiu, 2023. "Performance evaluation for health‐care sectors using a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2237-2253, June.
    3. Dar, Khursheed Hussain & Raina, Shahid Hamid, 2024. "Public healthcare efficiency in India: Estimates and determinants using two stage DEA approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Chen, Kuan-Chen & Lin, Sun-Yuan & Yu, Ming-Miin, 2022. "Exploring the efficiency of hospital and pharmacy utilizations in Taiwan: An application of dynamic network data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lozano, Sebastián, 2016. "Slacks-based inefficiency approach for general networks with bad outputs: An application to the banking sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 73-84.
    2. Monireh Jahani Sayyad Noveiri & Sohrab Kordrostami & Alireza Amirteimoori, 2022. "Performance analysis of sustainable supply networks with bounded, discrete, and joint factors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 238-270, January.
    3. Mehrdokht Pournader & Andrew Kach & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Ali Emrouznejad, 2017. "Investigating the impact of behavioral factors on supply network efficiency: insights from banking’s corporate bond networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 277-302, July.
    4. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    5. Kuangnan Fang & BenChang Shia & Shuangge Ma, 2012. "Health Insurance Coverage and Impact: A Survey in Three Cities in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-8, June.
    6. Hirofumi Fukuyama & William L. Weber, 2017. "Japanese Bank Productivity, 2007–2012: A Dynamic Network Approach," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 649-676, October.
    7. Phung, Manh-Trung & Cheng, Cheng-Ping & Guo, Chuanyin & Kao, Chen-Yu, 2020. "Mixed Network DEA with Shared Resources: A Case of Measuring Performance for Banking Industry," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    8. Huang, Tai-Hsin & Lin, Chung-I & Chen, Kuan-Chen, 2017. "Evaluating efficiencies of Chinese commercial banks in the context of stochastic multistage technologies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 93-110.
    9. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2019. "Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 70-79.
    10. Galagedera, Don U.A. & Roshdi, Israfil & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Zhu, Joe, 2018. "A new network DEA model for mutual fund performance appraisal: An application to U.S. equity mutual funds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 168-179.
    11. Yaliu Yang & Yuan Wang & Cui Wang & Yingyan Zhang & Cuixia Zhang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of the Science and Technology Innovative Efficiency of Regional Industrial Enterprises: A Data-Driven Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Kaffash, Sepideh & Azizi, Roza & Huang, Ying & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A survey of data envelopment analysis applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 801-813.
    13. Kao, Chiang, 2018. "Multiplicative aggregation of division efficiencies in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 328-336.
    14. Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos & Beullens, Patrick & Kyrgiakos, Leonidas Sotirios & Klein, Jonathan, 2022. "Measurement and evaluation of multi-function parallel network hierarchical DEA systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Li, Yongjun & Chen, Yao & Liang, Liang & Xie, Jianhui, 2012. "DEA models for extended two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 611-618.
    16. Plácido Moreno & Sebastián Lozano, 2014. "A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 214(1), pages 99-124, March.
    17. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Li, Feng & Zhang, Danlu & Zhang, Jinyu & Kou, Gang, 2022. "Measuring the energy production and utilization efficiency of Chinese thermal power industry with the fixed-sum carbon emission constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    19. Despotis, Dimitris K. & Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris, 2016. "The “weak-link” approach to network DEA for two-stage processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 481-492.
    20. Hsiao-Yen Mao & Wen-Min Lu & Hsin-Yen Shieh, 2023. "Exploring the Influence of Environmental Investment on Multinational Enterprises’ Performance from the Sustainability and Marketability Efficiency Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4847-:d:293229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.