Author
Listed:
- Kapil Chousalkar
(School of Animal and Veterinary Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5371, Australia)
- Sarah Sims
(School of Animal and Veterinary Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5371, Australia)
- Andrea McWhorter
(School of Animal and Veterinary Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5371, Australia)
- Samiullah Khan
(School of Animal and Veterinary Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5371, Australia)
- Margaret Sexton
(Primary Industries and Regions, Adelaide 5065, Australia)
Abstract
Chicken meat can potentially become contaminated with bacteria at the processing plant. In Australia, there is currently a lack of knowledge on the parameters and indications of use of non-chlorine based treatments in the chicken meat processing plants. Chlorine is widely used as a sanitizer in Australian chicken meat processing plants but due to occupational health and safety concerns and consumer perception, there is a need to identify alternative sanitizers. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of four different sanitizers in reducing the microbial load from naturally contaminated chicken meat carcasses collected from the processing plants in South Australia. There was a significant variation in a load of Campylobacter and total viable count (TVC) between samples collected from two different processing plants and within carcass batches collected from the same plant that was tested during the study. All sanitizers generally reduced the load of Campylobacter on chicken meat carcasses. Treatment with acidified sodium chlorite significantly reduced the level of Salmonella enterica serovars at all temperatures tested during this study. These findings are helpful to the industry for selection of the appropriate sanitizers. Findings are also useful for the regulatory authorities in Australia for providing approval for the use of sanitizers.
Suggested Citation
Kapil Chousalkar & Sarah Sims & Andrea McWhorter & Samiullah Khan & Margaret Sexton, 2019.
"The Effect of Sanitizers on Microbial Levels of Chicken Meat Collected from Commercial Processing Plants,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-11, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4807-:d:292450
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4807-:d:292450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.