IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i23p4694-d290721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence during Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study from Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Bosena Tebeje Gashaw

    (College of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma 1355, Ethiopia
    Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway)

  • Jeanette H. Magnus

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
    Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA)

  • Berit Schei

    (Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Science and Technology, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Kari Nyheim Solbraekke

    (Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) in pregnancy adversely affects the health of women and unborn children. To prevent this, the community responses, societal systems, and structures to support victims of IPV in pregnancy are vital. Objectives: to explore community stakeholders’ perspectives related to IPV in pregnancy in Jimma, Ethiopia, and if needed, create the knowledge base for interventions. Methods: using an exploratory design, this qualitative study had a maximum-variation (multiple spectrum sources) sampling strategy with 16 semi-structured interviews of purposively selected key informants representing different community institutions. Guided by Connell’s theory of gender and power, a content analysis of the translated interviews was conducted using Atlas.ti 7 software. Results: reconciliation between IPV victims and their abusers was the solution promoted by almost all the respondents. There was limited awareness of the adverse impacts IPV in pregnancy has on the health of the woman and the foetus. Despite regular encounters with victims, there is no organized or structured operational response to support IPV victims between the participating institutions. Conclusion: the potential danger of IPV for the mother or the unborn child was not well understood by the members of the studied Ethiopian community. Neither coordinated efforts to support IPV victims nor links among relevant agencies existed. The study demonstrated the dire need of coordinated practical action, changes in current socio-cultural norms, formal training and capacity building, awareness creation, clear intervention guidelines, and facilitation of support networks among relevant institutions in Ethiopian communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Bosena Tebeje Gashaw & Jeanette H. Magnus & Berit Schei & Kari Nyheim Solbraekke, 2019. "Community Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence during Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study from Ethiopia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4694-:d:290721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4694/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4694/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bosena Tebeje Gashaw & Berit Schei & Kari Nyheim Solbraekke & Jeanette H. Magnus, 2020. "Ethiopian Health Care Workers’ Insights into and Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4694-:d:290721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.