IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i22p4561-d288216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adapting Digital Social Prescribing for Suicide Bereavement Support: The Findings of a Consultation Exercise to Explore the Acceptability of Implementing Digital Social Prescribing within an Existing Postvention Service

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Galway

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK)

  • Trisha Forbes

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK)

  • Sharon Mallon

    (Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, Open University, Walton Hall MK7 6AA, UK)

  • Olinda Santin

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK)

  • Paul Best

    (School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK)

  • Jennifer Neff

    (Elemental Software, Derry (HQ), Derry BT48 6HP, UK)

  • Gerry Leavey

    (Bamford Centre for Mental Health, Psychology Research Institute, Ulster University, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, UK)

  • Alexandra Pitman

    (UCL Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

Abstract

This paper describes a consultation exercise to explore the acceptability of adapting digital social prescribing (DSP) for suicide bereavement support. Bereavement by suicide increases the risk of suicide and mental health issues. Social prescribing improves connectedness and empowerment and can provide digital outcomes-based reporting to improve the capacity for measuring the effectiveness of interventions. Our aim was to consult on the acceptability and potential value of DSP for addressing the complexities of suicide bereavement support. Our approach was underpinned by implementation science and a co-design ethos. We reviewed the literature and delivered DSP demonstrations as part of our engagement process with commissioners and service providers ( marrying evidence and context ) and identified key roles for stakeholders ( facilitation ). Stakeholders contributed to a co-designed workshop to establish consensus on the challenges of providing postvention support. We present findings on eight priority challenges, as well as roles and outcomes for testing the feasibility of DSP for support after suicide. There was a consensus that DSP could potentially improve access, reach, and monitoring of care and support. Stakeholders also recognised the potential for DSP to contribute substantially to the evidence base for postvention support. In conclusion, the consultation exercise identified challenges to facilitating DSP for support after suicide and parameters for feasibility testing to progress to the evaluation of this innovative approach to postvention.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Galway & Trisha Forbes & Sharon Mallon & Olinda Santin & Paul Best & Jennifer Neff & Gerry Leavey & Alexandra Pitman, 2019. "Adapting Digital Social Prescribing for Suicide Bereavement Support: The Findings of a Consultation Exercise to Explore the Acceptability of Implementing Digital Social Prescribing within an Existing ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4561-:d:288216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irina Kinchin & Christopher M. Doran, 2018. "The Cost of Youth Suicide in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Alexandra Pitman & Khadija Rantell & Louise Marston & Michael King & David Osborn, 2017. "Perceived Stigma of Sudden Bereavement as a Risk Factor for Suicidal Thoughts and Suicide Attempt: Analysis of British Cross-Sectional Survey Data on 3387 Young Bereaved Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maarten Houben & Rens Brankaert & Gail Kenning & Berry Eggen & Inge Bongers, 2020. "The Perspectives of Professional Caregivers on Implementing Audio-Based Technology in Residential Dementia Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angel Marie Chater & Neil Howlett & Gillian W. Shorter & Julia K. Zakrzewski-Fruer & Jane Williams, 2022. "Reflections on Experiencing Parental Bereavement as a Young Person: A Retrospective Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Zhihui Jia & Xiaotong Wen & Feiyu Chen & Hui Zhu & Can Li & Yixiang Lin & Xiaoxu Xie & Zhaokang Yuan, 2020. "Cumulative Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experience: Depressive Symptoms, Suicide Intensions and Suicide Plans among Senior High School Students in Nanchang City of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Simon Deeming & Kim Edmunds & Alice Knight & Andrew Searles & Anthony P. Shakeshaft & Christopher M. Doran, 2022. "A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Jovita Tan & Karl Andriessen, 2021. "The Experiences of Grief and Personal Growth in University Students: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Valeriya Azorina & Nicola Morant & Hedvig Nesse & Fiona Stevenson & David Osborn & Michael King & Alexandra Pitman, 2019. "The Perceived Impact of Suicide Bereavement on Specific Interpersonal Relationships: A Qualitative Study of Survey Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Lauren Drabwell & Jessica Eng & Fiona Stevenson & Michael King & David Osborn & Alexandra Pitman, 2020. "Perceptions of the Use of Alcohol and Drugs after Sudden Bereavement by Unnatural Causes: Analysis of Online Qualitative Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Jingjing Zhao & Yanna Chi & Yanli Ju & Xiyao Liu & Jingjing Wang & Xinglai Liu & Bob Lew & Ching Sin Siau & Cunxian Jia, 2020. "Shame and Suicidal Ideation among Undergraduates in China: The Mediating Effect of Thwarted Belongingness and Perceived Burdensomeness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Merike Sisask & Kairi Kõlves, 2018. "Towards a Greater Understanding of Suicidal Behaviour and Its Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-8, August.
    9. Eve Griffin & Selena O’Connell & Eimear Ruane-McAteer & Paul Corcoran & Ella Arensman, 2022. "Psychosocial Outcomes of Individuals Attending a Suicide Bereavement Peer Support Group: A Follow-Up Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    10. Ke Ning & Chun Yan & Yanjie Zhang & Sitong Chen, 2022. "Regular Exercise with Suicide Ideation, Suicide Plan and Suicide Attempt in University Students: Data from the Health Minds Survey 2018–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
    11. Irina Kinchin & Christopher M. Doran, 2018. "Correction: Kinchin, I.; Doran, C.M. The Cost of Youth Suicide in Australia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15 , 672," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-4, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4561-:d:288216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.