IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i22p4488-d286876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Emma L. Jamieson

    (The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Bunbury 6233, Australia)

  • Erica P. Spry

    (Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome 6725, Australia
    The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome 6725, Australia)

  • Andrew B. Kirke

    (The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Bunbury 6233, Australia)

  • David N. Atkinson

    (The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome 6725, Australia)

  • Julia V. Marley

    (Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome 6725, Australia
    The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome 6725, Australia)

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common antenatal complication in Australia. All pregnant women are recommended for screening by 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). As part of a study to improve screening, 694 women from 27 regional, rural and remote clinics were recruited from 2015–2018 into the Optimisation of Rural Clinical and Haematological Indicators for Diabetes in pregnancy (ORCHID) study. Most routine OGTT samples were analysed more than four hours post fasting collection (median 5.0 h, range 2.3 to 124 h), potentially reducing glucose levels due to glycolysis. In 2019, to assess pre-analytical plasma glucose (PG) instability over time, we evaluated alternative sample handling protocols in a sample of participants. Four extra samples were collected alongside routine room temperature (RT) fluoride-oxalate samples (FLOX RT ): study FLOX RT ; ice slurry (FLOX ICE ); RT fluoride-citrate-EDTA (FC Mix), and RT lithium-heparin plasma separation tubes (PST). Time course glucose measurements were then used to estimate glycolysis from ORCHID participants who completed routine OGTT after 24 weeks gestation ( n = 501). Adjusting for glycolysis using FLOX ICE measurements estimated 62% under-diagnosis of GDM (FLOX RT 10.8% v FLOX ICE 28.5% (95% CI, 20.8–29.5%), p < 0.001). FC Mix tubes provided excellent glucose stability but gave slightly higher results (Fasting PG: +0.20 ± 0.05 mmol/L). While providing a realistic alternative to the impractical FLOX ICE protocol, direct substitution of FC Mix tubes in clinical practice may require revision of GDM diagnostic thresholds.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma L. Jamieson & Erica P. Spry & Andrew B. Kirke & David N. Atkinson & Julia V. Marley, 2019. "Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4488-:d:286876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josephine G Laurie & H. David McIntyre, 2020. "A Review of the Current Status of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Australia—The Clinical Impact of Changing Population Demographics and Diagnostic Criteria on Prevalence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Louise Groth Grunnet & Line Hjort & Daniel Thomas Minja & Omari Abdul Msemo & Sofie Lykke Møller & Rashmi B. Prasad & Leif Groop & John Lusingu & Birgitte Bruun Nielsen & Christentze Schmiegelow & Ib , 2020. "High Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Rural Tanzania—Diagnosis Mainly Based on Fasting Blood Glucose from Oral Glucose Tolerance Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-11, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4488-:d:286876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.