Author
Listed:
- Sihan Chen
(State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)
- Yingjin Li
(Yunnan Institute of Water & Hydropower Engineering Investigation, Design and Research, Kunming 650021, China)
- Zhong Tian
(State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)
- Qiang Fan
(State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)
Abstract
The flood propagation at a confluence of channels exhibits a unique routing pattern, while there are few studies on the routing of dam-break flow in confluent channels. In this study, we conducted physical experiments and a numerical simulation to investigate the influence of different confluence angles on the routing of a dam-break flood. Experiments were carried out in smooth, transparent, rectangular prismatic channels to study the dam-break flow under four different confluence angles. The flow velocity was measured using an image processing technique, and the surface flow field was effectively captured by synchronously recording the particle motion images. Based on the variation of the water level and flow discharge, as the confluence angle increased, the retardation and abatement effects on the flood increased. Specifically, the flood arrival time was delayed by approximately 0.91% to 21.18%, and the peak flood discharge was reduced by approximately 9.05% to 58.36%. Combined with the surface flow field at the confluence and in the downstream sections, as the confluence angle increased, the impact points at the confluence and in the downstream straight sections moved upward, and the impact range was reduced. Combined with the pressure variation pattern, the routing of dam-break flow in the confluent channels experienced a process of impact-reflection-return-attenuation.
Suggested Citation
Sihan Chen & Yingjin Li & Zhong Tian & Qiang Fan, 2019.
"On Dam-Break Flow Routing in Confluent Channels,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4384-:d:285405
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4384-:d:285405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.