IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i21p4199-d281590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrepancies in Karst Soil Organic Carbon in Southwest China for Different Land Use Patterns: A Case Study of Guizhou Province

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenming Zhang

    (Institute for Forest Resources & Environment of Guizhou, Key Laboratory of forest cultivation in plateau mountain area, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    Institute of biological research of Guizhou, Guizhou Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xianfei Huang

    (Institute for Forest Resources & Environment of Guizhou, Key Laboratory of forest cultivation in plateau mountain area, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    Institute of biological research of Guizhou, Guizhou Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China
    Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Environment, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yunchao Zhou

    (Institute for Forest Resources & Environment of Guizhou, Key Laboratory of forest cultivation in plateau mountain area, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    Institute of biological research of Guizhou, Guizhou Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Jiachun Zhang

    (Guizhou Botanical Garden, Guizhou Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou 550000, China)

  • Xubo Zhang

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

The assessment of soil organic carbon (SOC) in mountainous karst areas is very challenging, due to the high spatial heterogeneity in SOC content and soil type. To study and assess the SOC storage in mountainous karst areas, a total of 22,786 soil samples were collected from 2,854 soil profiles in Guizhou Province in Southwest China. The SOC content in the soil samples was determined by the oxidation of potassium dichromate (K 2 Cr 2 O 7 ), followed by titration with iron (II) sulfate (FeSO 4 ). The SOC storage was assessed based on different land uses. The results suggested that the average SOC density in the top 1.00 m of soil associated with different land uses decreased in the following order: Croplands (9.58 kg m −2 ) > garden lands (9.07 kg m −2 ) > grasslands (8.07 kg m −2 ) > forestlands (7.35 kg m −2 ) > uncultivated lands (6.94 kg m −2 ). The SOC storage values in the 0.00–0.10 m, 0.00–0.20 m, 0.00–0.30 m and 0.00–1.00 m soil layers of Guizhou Province were 0.50, 0.87, 1.11 and 1.58 Pg, respectively. The SOC in the top 0.30 m of soil accounted for 70.25% of the total within the 0.00–1.00 m layer in Guizhou Province. It was concluded that assessing SOC storage in mountainous karst areas was more accurate when using land use rather than soil type. This result can supply a scientific reference for the accurate assessment of the SOC storage in the karst areas of southwestern China, the islands of Java, northern and central Vietnam, Indonesia, Kampot Province in Cambodia and in the general area of what used to be Yugoslavia, along with other karst areas with similar ecological backgrounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenming Zhang & Xianfei Huang & Yunchao Zhou & Jiachun Zhang & Xubo Zhang, 2019. "Discrepancies in Karst Soil Organic Carbon in Southwest China for Different Land Use Patterns: A Case Study of Guizhou Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4199-:d:281590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4199/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4199/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shengzi Chen & Zhongfa Zhou & Lihui Yan & Bo Li, 2016. "Quantitative Evaluation of Ecosystem Health in a Karst Area of South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Zhenming Zhang & Yunchao Zhou & Shijie Wang & Xianfei Huang, 2018. "Spatial Distribution of Stony Desertification and Key Influencing Factors on Different Sampling Scales in Small Karst Watersheds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui Fang & Qiuxiao Yan & Zhenming Zhang & Daoping Wang & Xianfei Huang, 2022. "Impacts of Rice–Rape Rotation on Major Soil Quality Indicators of Soil in the Karst Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng Zeng & Gaoning Zhang & Tianyang Li & Binghui He & Dengyu Zhang, 2024. "Spatial-Temporal Heterogeneity of Ecosystem Service Value Driven by Nature-Human Activity-Policy in a Representative Fragile Karst Trough Valley, SW China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Dan Ye & Liu Yang & Min Zhou, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variation in Ecosystem Health and Its Driving Factors in Guizhou Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Zhenming Zhang & Yunchao Zhou & Shijie Wang & Xianfei Huang, 2018. "Spatial Distribution of Stony Desertification and Key Influencing Factors on Different Sampling Scales in Small Karst Watersheds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Jiachun Zhang & Guiting Mu & Zhenming Zhang & Xianfei Huang & Hui Fang, 2021. "Speciation Variation and Bio-Activation of Soil Heavy Metals (Cd and Cr) in Rice-Rape Rotation Lands in Karst Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Yangling Zhao & Rui Han & Nan Cui & Jingbiao Yang & Luo Guo, 2020. "The Impact of Urbanization on Ecosystem Health in Typical Karst Areas: A Case Study of Liupanshui City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Zhilei Yu & Tianling Qin & Dengming Yan & Meijian Yang & Hexin Yu & Wanli Shi, 2018. "The Impact on the Ecosystem Services Value of the Ecological Shelter Zone Reconstruction in the Upper Reaches Basin of the Yangtze River in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Kaifang Shi & Qingyuan Yang & Yuanqing Li, 2019. "Are Karst Rocky Desertification Areas Affected by Increasing Human Activity in Southern China? An Empirical Analysis from Nighttime Light Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4199-:d:281590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.