IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i21p4104-d280045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Z. Ramadan

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sultan N. Al-Tayyar

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

It is important for schoolchildren and their parents (or guardians) to know which backpacks exert the least strain on the cardiorespiratory system. In this study, we investigated the physiological responses of participants while they were walking on a treadmill and wearing one of three different backpacks (A, B, and C) under two different load-carrying conditions (equivalent to 10% and 15% of their body mass, respectively). The first condition was used as a control and involved walking without a backpack, while the second involved wearing a backpack and carrying a certain weight. Thirty-one male students from King Saud University walked on a treadmill at 0.861 m/s and at a 0% inclination angle, while having their heart rates (beatsmin −1 ), oxygen uptakes (VO2, mLmin −1 ), respiratory rates (breaths, VO2min −1 ), perceived exertion rates (PER, Borg scale), and backpack preference rates (BPR) measured and recorded. The results of our within-subject experimental design revealed that the physiological results varied significantly depending on the type of backpack. Backpacks B and C were superior to Backpack A, resulting in lower physiological responses and higher subjective preferences. Students carrying more weight experienced higher physiological stress; moreover, the use of Backpack C led to the lowest physiological strains and higher subjective preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Z. Ramadan & Sultan N. Al-Tayyar, 2019. "Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4104-:d:280045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4104-:d:280045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.