Author
Listed:
- Xiaofeng Huang
(Poultry Science Institute, Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China)
- Yi Luo
(Poultry Science Institute, Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China)
- Zuolan Liu
(Poultry Science Institute, Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China)
- Changlian Zhang
(Poultry Science Institute, Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China)
- Hang Zhong
(Poultry Science Institute, Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China)
- Jiajia Xue
(Poultry Science Institute, Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China)
- Qigui Wang
(Poultry Science Institute, Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China
Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Livestock Equipment Engineering in Southwest, Ministry of Agriculture, Chongqing 402460, China)
- Zhiping Zhu
(Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)
- Chao Wang
(Poultry Science Institute, Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China
Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Livestock Equipment Engineering in Southwest, Ministry of Agriculture, Chongqing 402460, China)
Abstract
Antibiotic and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) have been considered as emerging environmental contaminants and possess potential crisis to global public health. However, little is known about the differences between various configurations of two-stage combinations of constructed wetlands (CWs) on antibiotics and ARG removal from wastewater. In the study, three configurations of two-stage hybrid CWs (horizontal subsurface flow-down-flow vertical subsurface flow CWs, HF-DVF; horizontal subsurface flow-up-flow vertical subsurface flow CWs, HF-UVF; down-flow vertical subsurface flow-up-flow vertical subsurface flow CWs, DVF-UVF) were operated to evaluate their ability to remove high-concentration antibiotics (tilmicosin—TMS and doxycycline—DOC), ARGs (seven tet genes and three erm genes), intI 1, 16S rRNA, and nutrients from goose wastewater. The results showed that all three hybrid CWs could remove more than 98% of TMS and DOC from wastewater, without significant difference among treatments ( p > 0.05). For ARGs, DVF-UVF showed significantly higher removal efficiencies of intI 1, erm B, erm C, erm F, tet W, and tet G compared to HF-UVF ( p < 0.05), mainly because they might remove and arrest growth of bacteria. The relatively high removal efficiencies of NH 4 + -N, NO 3 — N, and NO 2 - -N were also observed from DVF-UVF, ranging from 87% to 95% ( p > 0.05), indicating that anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) might be established in the CWs. Our results demonstrate that the removal performances of antibiotics using two-stage hybrid CWs are not affected by the combined configuration, whereas the combination of DVF and UVF CWs perform better on the removal of ARGs and nutrients compared with HF-DVF and HF-UVF CWs.
Suggested Citation
Xiaofeng Huang & Yi Luo & Zuolan Liu & Changlian Zhang & Hang Zhong & Jiajia Xue & Qigui Wang & Zhiping Zhu & Chao Wang, 2019.
"Influence of Two-Stage Combinations of Constructed Wetlands on the Removal of Antibiotics, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Nutrients from Goose Wastewater,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-11, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4030-:d:278841
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4030-:d:278841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.