IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i20p4020-d278566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Approaches to Increase Physical Activity for Preschool Children in Child Care Centers: A Matched-Pair Cluster-Randomized Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Pooja S. Tandon

    (Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98145, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Katherine L. Downing

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Brian E. Saelens

    (Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98145, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Dimitri A. Christakis

    (Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98145, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

Abstract

Early childhood education settings are critical for promoting physical activity (PA) but intervention effects are often small. The aim of this study was to develop, test, and compare two approaches to increasing physical activity among preschoolers at child care centers: one focused on a teacher-led PA curriculum (Active Play!) and the other on increasing outdoor child-initiated free play time (Outdoor Play!). We conducted a matched-pair cluster-randomized study in 10 centers in and around Seattle, WA, USA (n = 97 children, mean age 4.6). Pre- and post-intervention data were collected from observations and accelerometers. At pre-intervention, 19% of Active Play! and 25% of Outdoor Play! children achieved >120 min/day of PA during child care. The total opportunity for PA increased in both interventions (Active Play! = 11 min/day; Outdoor Play! = 14 min/day), with the largest increase in outdoor child-initiated free playtime (Active Play! = 19 min/day; Outdoor Play! = 24 min/day). No changes in sedentary time, light or moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) were observed in either intervention and there was no difference between interventions in the percentage of children attaining more than 120 min/day of PA. A small (<3 min/day) relative increase in teacher-led outdoor activity was observed in the Active Play! intervention. Both intervention strategies led to an increase in active play opportunities, predominantly outdoors, but neither was able to substantially increase the intensity and/or duration of children’s PA. Future studies are needed to better understand and inform sustainable approaches to increase PA in early learning settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooja S. Tandon & Katherine L. Downing & Brian E. Saelens & Dimitri A. Christakis, 2019. "Two Approaches to Increase Physical Activity for Preschool Children in Child Care Centers: A Matched-Pair Cluster-Randomized Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4020-:d:278566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/4020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/4020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:4373 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Larouche & Madeline Kleinfeld & Ulises Charles Rodriguez & Cheryl Hatten & Victoria Hecker & David R. Scott & Leanna Marie Brown & Ogochukwu K. Onyeso & Farzana Sadia & Hanako Shimamura, 2023. "Determinants of Outdoor Time in Children and Youth: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal and Intervention Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Anders Fritz Lerche & Maja Vilhelmsen & Kathrine Greby Schmidt & Rasmus Kildedal & Natja Launbo & Pernille Kold Munch & Mark Lidegaard & Sandra Schade Jacobsen & Charlotte Lund Rasmussen & Svend Erik , 2020. "Can Childcare Work Be Designed to Promote High Intensity Physical Activity for Improved Fitness and Health? A Proof of Concept Study of the Goldilocks Principle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4020-:d:278566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.