IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i20p4019-d278569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Smoke-Free Legislation in Indoor Public Places in Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanxia Wei

    (Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Ron Borland

    (Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia)

  • Pinpin Zheng

    (Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Hua Fu

    (Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Fan Wang

    (Department of Politics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Jingyi He

    (Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Yitian Feng

    (Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China)

Abstract

This study evaluated compliance with the comprehensive smoke-free law in public indoor places introduced in Shanghai in March 2017. Observations and PM2.5 monitoring over 30 min intervals in 8 types of the venue were conducted three times: within a month before implementation and 3- and 12-months post implementation. Observations of evidence of smoking decreased from 66.2% before legislation to 52.8% three months after ( p = 0.002) and 49.7% one year after ( p < 0.001). The density of lit cigarettes also reduced significantly after implementation ( p < 0.001). When adjusting for outdoor, indoor PM2.5 levels were significantly lower after the legislation, but only by a small amount (three months later: −0.27, p = 0.08; one year later: −0.12; p = 0.03). Evidence of compliance was weakest in farmer’s markets and bars, and smoking in male toilets did not change significantly. The reduction in smoking was affected by the management performance of their obligations. The comprehensive smoke-free law led to modest reductions in smoking and PM2.5 levels as a result, but from levels suggesting quite high levels of pre-compliance. However, compliance was limited in some areas, suggesting more effort is required on management to gain better compliance in some places like farmer’s markets, bars, and toilets.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanxia Wei & Ron Borland & Pinpin Zheng & Hua Fu & Fan Wang & Jingyi He & Yitian Feng, 2019. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Smoke-Free Legislation in Indoor Public Places in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4019-:d:278569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/4019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/4019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao Gong & Xiaofeng Luo & Li Ling, 2016. "Prevalence and Associated Factors of Secondhand Smoke Exposure among Internal Chinese Migrant Women of Reproductive Age: Evidence from China’s Labor-Force Dynamic Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Hans Melberg & Karl Lund, 2012. "Do smoke-free laws affect revenues in pubs and restaurants?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(1), pages 93-99, February.
    3. Benjamin C. Alamar & Stanton A. Glantz, 2004. "Smoke‐free Ordinances Increase Restaurant Profit and Value," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 22(4), pages 520-525, October.
    4. Alamar, B C & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2004. "Smoke-free ordinances increase restaurant profit and value," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt91w950j4, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reichmann, Gerhard & Sommersguter-Reichmann, Margit, 2012. "The Austrian Tobacco Act in practice – Analysing the effectiveness of partial smoking bans in Austrian restaurants and bars," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 304-311.
    2. Annette Hofmann & Martin Nell, 2012. "Smoking bans and the secondhand smoking problem: an economic analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(3), pages 227-236, June.
    3. Kvasnicka, Michael & Tauchmann, Harald, 2012. "Much ado about nothing? Smoking bans and Germany's hospitality industry," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 44(35), pages 4539-4551.
    4. Tami Gurley-Calvez & George W. Hammond & Randall A. Childs, 2014. "Labor Market Impacts Of Smoking Regulations On The Restaurant Industry," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 32(4), pages 681-694, October.
    5. Tomlin Jonathan T., 2009. "The Impact of Smoking Bans on the Hospitality Industry: New Evidence from Stock Market Returns," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Silvia Tiezzi, 2009. "The Economic Impact of Clean Indoor Air Laws: A Review of Alternative Approaches and of Empirical findings," Department of Economics University of Siena 570, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    7. Robert K. Fleck & F. Andrew Hanssen, 2008. "Why Understanding Smoking Bans Is Important For Estimating Their Effects: California’S Restaurant Smoking Bans And Restaurant Sales," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 46(1), pages 60-76, January.
    8. Benjamin C. Alamar & Stanton A. Glantz, 2008. "Externalities in the Workplace: A Response to a Rejoinder to a Response to a Response to a Paper," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 5(2), pages 169-173, May.
    9. Jerome Adda & Samuel Berlinski & V. Bhaskar & Stephen Machin, 2009. "Market regulation and firm performance: the case of smoking bans in the UK," IFS Working Papers W09/13, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Renaud Foucart, 2017. "Group Consumption and Product Diversity: The Case of Smoking Bans," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 559-584, September.
    11. Steven G. Medema, 2020. "The Coase Theorem at Sixty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1045-1128, December.
    12. Jérôme Adda & Samuel Berlinski & Stephen Machin, 2012. "Market Regulation and Firm Performance: The Case of Smoking Bans in the United Kingdom," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(2), pages 365-391.
    13. Ahlfeldt Gabriel M. & Maennig Wolfgang, 2010. "Impact of Non-smoking Ordinances on Hospitality Revenues: The Case of Germany," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 230(5), pages 506-521, October.
    14. David R. Henderson, 2007. "Smoking in Restaurants: Who Best to Set the House Rules?," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 4(3), pages 284-291, September.
    15. Ljudevit Pranic & Snjezana Pivac & Anela Colak, 2013. "Cafe Owners Attitudes Before The Enactment Of A Smoke-Free Legislation In Transition Countries," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 22(1), pages 57-78, june.
    16. Bharadwaj, Prashant & Johnsen, Julian V. & Løken, Katrine V., 2014. "Smoking bans, maternal smoking and birth outcomes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 72-93.
    17. Michael L. Marlow, 2008. "Honestly, Who Else Would Fund Such Research? Reflections of a Non-Smoking Scholar," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 5(2), pages 240-268, May.
    18. Jaume García-Villar & Ángel López-Nicolás, 2015. "Who is afraid of smoking bans? An evaluation of the effects of the Spanish clean air law on expenditure at hospitality venues," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(8), pages 813-834, November.
    19. Barbara Badanta & Juan Vega-Escaño & Sergio Barrientos-Trigo & Lorena Tarriño-Concejero & María Ángeles García-Carpintero Muñoz & María González-Cano-Caballero & Antonio Barbero-Radío & Domingo de-Ped, 2021. "Acculturation, Health Behaviors, and Social Relations among Chinese Immigrants Living in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Robles-Rovalo, Arturo & Díaz-Goti, Emiliano & Guarneros-Gutiérrez, Rodrigo, 2018. "The Nature and Magnitude of the Effects of Asymmetric Regulation of Mobile Termination Rates on the Mexican Retail Prices," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190426, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4019-:d:278569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.