IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i1p108-d194572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engagement, Passion and Meaning of Work as Modulating Variables in Nursing: A Theoretical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Gómez-Salgado

    (Nursing Department, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain
    Safety and Health Posgrade Program, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil 091650, Ecuador)

  • Yolanda Navarro-Abal

    (Department of Social, Developmental and Education Psychology, Faculty of Education Science, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • María José López-López

    (Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Education Science, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • Macarena Romero-Martín

    (Red Cross Nursing University Center, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain)

  • José Antonio Climent-Rodríguez

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Isabel I University, 09003 Burgos, Spain)

Abstract

Nurses are continuously exposed to stressors and psychological and physical risks that can negatively influence their daily work. These adverse psychosocial circumstances, accompanied by the poor self-perception of health, well-being, and quality of life, may trigger burnout. The positive psychology approach pursues a growth of passion at work, increased job satisfaction, and occupational health, both mental and physical, for the optimal performance of the nursing role. In this way, a theoretical analysis was conducted to describe the basic constructs of positive psychology, elements such as engagement, passion at work, centrality, and meaning of work, which could act as protective factors in the nursing profession. The results show that if health professionals are not physically involved, cognitively alert, and emotionally connected, they may not offer the quality care patients require. Positive psychology helps nurses in facing their complex reality and relevant daily activities in order to provide quality care. These efforts towards a humanist nursing care in which professionals are able to care for the others as well as themselves should be made.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Gómez-Salgado & Yolanda Navarro-Abal & María José López-López & Macarena Romero-Martín & José Antonio Climent-Rodríguez, 2019. "Engagement, Passion and Meaning of Work as Modulating Variables in Nursing: A Theoretical Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:108-:d:194572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/108/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/108/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiaoqin Wan & Weijiao Zhou & Zhaoyang Li & Shaomei Shang & Fang Yu, 2018. "Work engagement and its predictors in registered nurses: A cross‐sectional design," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 415-421, December.
    2. Eli Manning & Marilou Gagnon, 2017. "The complex patient: A concept clarification," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 13-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doris Gebhard & Julia Neumann & Magdalena Wimmer & Filip Mess, 2022. "The Second Side of the Coin—Resilience, Meaningfulness and Joyful Moments in Home Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Gabriela Topa & Mercedes Aranda-Carmena, 2022. "Job Crafting in Nursing: Mediation between Work Engagement and Job Performance in a Multisample Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:108-:d:194572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.