IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i19p3630-d271340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Service Level Factors Associated with Cervical Screening in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care Centres in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Abbey Diaz

    (Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina 0810, Australia)

  • Brenda Vo

    (Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina 0810, Australia)

  • Peter D. Baade

    (Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina 0810, Australia
    Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia)

  • Veronica Matthews

    (University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore 2480, Australia)

  • Barbara Nattabi

    (School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia)

  • Jodie Bailie

    (University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore 2480, Australia)

  • Lisa J. Whop

    (Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina 0810, Australia)

  • Ross Bailie

    (University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore 2480, Australia)

  • Gail Garvey

    (Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina 0810, Australia)

Abstract

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women have significantly higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality than other Australian women. In this study, we assessed the documented delivery of cervical screening for women attending Indigenous Primary Health Care (PHC) centres across Australia and identified service-level factors associated with between-centre variation in screening coverage. We analysed 3801 clinical audit records for PHC clients aged 20–64 years from 135 Indigenous PHC centres participating in the Audit for Best Practice in Chronic Disease (ABCD) continuous quality improvement (CQI) program across five Australian states/territories during 2005 to 2014. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to identify service-level factors associated with screening, while accounting for differences in client-level factors. There was substantial variation in the proportion of clients who had a documented cervical screen in the previous two years across the participating PHC centres (median 50%, interquartile range (IQR): 29–67%), persisting over years and audit cycle. Centre-level factors explained 40% of the variation; client-level factors did not reduce the between-centre variation. Screening coverage was associated with longer time enrolled in the CQI program and very remote location. Indigenous PHC centres play an important role in providing cervical screening to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Thus, their leadership is essential to ensure that Australia’s public health commitment to the elimination of cervical cancer includes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. A sustained commitment to CQI may improve PHC centres delivery of cervical screening; however, factors that may impact on service delivery, such as organisational, geographical and environmental factors, warrant further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbey Diaz & Brenda Vo & Peter D. Baade & Veronica Matthews & Barbara Nattabi & Jodie Bailie & Lisa J. Whop & Ross Bailie & Gail Garvey, 2019. "Service Level Factors Associated with Cervical Screening in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care Centres in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3630-:d:271340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3630/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3630/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3630-:d:271340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.