Author
Listed:
- Padraic Nicholas
(Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarr’s Hospital, Douglas Road, T12 XH60 Cork, Ireland
These authors contributed equally to the work.)
- Rónán O’Caoimh
(Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarr’s Hospital, Douglas Road, T12 XH60 Cork, Ireland
Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Costello Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland
These authors contributed equally to the work.)
- Yang Gao
(Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarr’s Hospital, Douglas Road, T12 XH60 Cork, Ireland)
- Afsana Habib
(Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland)
- Thomas Karol Mross
(Geriatrisches Zentrum Bethanien, Agaplesion Bethanien Krankenhaus, Rohrbacher Str. 149, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany)
- Roger Clarnette
(School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia)
- D. William Molloy
(Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarr’s Hospital, Douglas Road, T12 XH60 Cork, Ireland
Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland)
Abstract
Although there is a high prevalence of delirium and cognitive impairment among hospitalised older adults, short, reliable cognitive measures are rarely used to monitor cognition and potentially alert healthcare professionals to early changes that might signal delirium. We evaluated the reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of logical memory (LM), immediate verbal recall of a short story, compared to brief tests of attention as a bedside “cognitive vital sign” (CVS). Trained nursing staff performed twice-daily cognitive assessments on 84 clinically stable inpatients in two geriatric units over 3–5 consecutive days using LM and short tests of attention and orientation including months of the year backwards. Scores were compared to those of an expert rater. Inter-rater reliability was excellent with correlation coefficients for LM increasing from r = 0.87 on day 1 to r = 0.97 by day 4 ( p < 0.0001). A diurnal fluctuation of two points from a total of 30 was deemed acceptable in clinically stable patients. LM scores were statistically similar ( p = 0.98) with repeated testing (suggesting no learning effect). All nurses reported that LM was feasible to score routinely. LM is a reliable measure of cognition showing diurnal variation but minimal learning effects. Further study is required to define the properties of an ideal CVS test, though LM may satisfy these.
Suggested Citation
Padraic Nicholas & Rónán O’Caoimh & Yang Gao & Afsana Habib & Thomas Karol Mross & Roger Clarnette & D. William Molloy, 2019.
"Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3545-:d:269579
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3545-:d:269579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.