IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i19p3508-d269151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing Activating Schoolyards: Seen from the Girls’ Viewpoint

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte S. Pawlowski

    (Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark)

  • Jenny Veitch

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia)

  • Henriette B. Andersen

    (Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark)

  • Nicola D. Ridgers

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia)

Abstract

Girls are typically less active in the schoolyard during recess than boys. It is therefore necessary to understand influences on girls’ recess activity in schoolyards. The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate girls’ perceptions of physical environmental factors influencing recess physical activity in re-designed schoolyards and to compare the perceptions of girls from different age groups. In 2018, 50 girls from five Danish schools were interviewed using photo-elicitation. The girls were from Grade 4 ( n = 28, age 10–11) and Grade 6 ( n = 22, age 12–13). Data were analysed using pen profiles constructed from verbatim transcripts. Ten factors emerged: variety, accessibility, size, designated spaces, greenery, playground markings, active play facilities, sports facilities, play equipment, and speakers. Play facilities (trampolines, obstacle courses, dancing and gymnastic appliances) were favoured over traditional sport facilities. Designated spaces, greenery and speakers were important for feeling comfortable within the schoolyard. Although similar factors were raised by the two age groups, some factors were perceived as enablers by the youngest and as barriers by the oldest girls, highlighting the complexity of designing schoolyards that cater to all ages. A greater understanding of how different designs and facilities may be perceived by girls of different ages is important for the design of future schoolyards.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte S. Pawlowski & Jenny Veitch & Henriette B. Andersen & Nicola D. Ridgers, 2019. "Designing Activating Schoolyards: Seen from the Girls’ Viewpoint," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3508-:d:269151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3508/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3508/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charlotte Skau Pawlowski & Jonas Vestergaard Nielsen & Tanja Schmidt, 2021. "A Ban on Smartphone Usage during Recess Increased Children’s Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Juan Miguel Kanai & Verónica Fabio & Marta Mirás & Lucas Gastiarena, 2024. "Making Green Heritage Schools Work: Nature-Based Solutions and Historical Preservation When Infrastructure Fails," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3508-:d:269151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.