IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i18p3389-d266884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variations in the Visual Probe Paradigms for Attention Bias Modification for Substance Use Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Melvyn Zhang

    (National Addiction Management Service, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore 539747, Singapore
    Family Medicine & Primary Care, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore 308232, Singapore)

  • Daniel S. S. Fung

    (Institute of Mental Health, Department of Developmental Psychiatry, Singapore 539747, Singapore)

  • Helen Smith

    (Family Medicine & Primary Care, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore 308232, Singapore)

Abstract

Advances in experimental psychology have provided evidence for the presence of attentional and approach biases in individuals with substance use disorders. Traditionally, reaction time tasks, such as the Stroop or the Visual Probe Task, are commonly used in the assessment of attention biases. The Visual Probe Task has been criticized for its poor reliability, and other research has highlighted that variations remain in the paradigms adopted. However, a gap remains in the published literature, as there have not been any prior studies that have reviewed stimulus timings for different substance use disorders. Such a review is pertinent, as the nature of the task might affect its effectiveness. The aim of this paper was in comparing the different methods used in the Visual Probe Task, by focusing on tasks that have been used for the most highly prevalent substance disorders—that of opiate use, cannabis use and stimulant use disorders. A total of eight published articles were identified for opioid use disorders, three for cannabis use disorders and four for stimulant use disorders. As evident from the synthesis, there is great variability in the paradigm adopted, with most articles including only information about the nature of the stimulus, the number of trials, the timings for the fixation cross and the timings for the stimulus set. Future research examining attentional biases among individuals with substance use disorders should take into consideration the paradigms that are commonly used and evaluate the optimal stimulus and stimulus-onset asynchrony timings.

Suggested Citation

  • Melvyn Zhang & Daniel S. S. Fung & Helen Smith, 2019. "Variations in the Visual Probe Paradigms for Attention Bias Modification for Substance Use Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3389-:d:266884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melvyn W. B. Zhang & Helen E. Smith, 2020. "Challenges When Evaluating Cognitive Bias Modification Interventions for Substance Use Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-7, October.
    2. Doris X.Y. Chia & Melvyn W.B. Zhang, 2020. "A Scoping Review of Cognitive Bias in Internet Addiction and Internet Gaming Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3389-:d:266884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.