Author
Listed:
- Kentaro Okuno
(Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Osaka Dental University, Osaka-city 540-0008, Japan
Division for Oral and Facial Disorders, Osaka University Dental Hospital, Suita-city 565-0871, Japan)
- Akifumi Furuhashi
(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute-city 480-1195, Japan)
- Shuhei Nakamura
(Dental Clinic for Sleep Disorders (Apnea and Snoring), Oral and Maxillofacial Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan)
- Hiroshi Suzuki
(Division of Oral Function and Rehabilitation, Department of Oral Health Science, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo-city 271-0061, Japan)
- Takehiro Arisaka
(Ota Memorial Sleep Center, Sleep Surgery Center, Kawasaki-city 210-0024, Japan)
- Hitoshi Taga
(Dentistry and Oral Surgery, JR Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo 151-8528, Japan)
- Masataka Tamura
(Department of Dentistry and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Komatsu Hospital, Neyagawa-city 572-0015, Japan)
- Haruto Katahira
(Katahira Dental Clinic, Tokyo 151-0053, Japan)
- Minoru Furuhata
(Furuhata Sleep-disordered Breathing Research Institute, Furuhata Dental Clinic, Tokyo 107-0052, Japan
Snore & Sleep Apnea Treatment Center, Nippon Dental University Hospital Internal Medicine, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan)
- Chisato Iida
(Iida Dental Clinic, Soka-city 340-0013, Japan)
Abstract
We conducted a multicenter survey for oral appliance (OA) therapy to grasp and analyze the current situation of OA therapy, including efficacy, side effects, and follow-up, in Japan. The Japanese cross-sectional multicenter survey (JAMS) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was undertaken by patients in 10 institutions associated with oral appliance therapy during two years, from 2014 to 2015, retrospectively. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), baseline apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), OA type, adjustment, adverse reactions with OA, and AHI with OA were elicited from the patient clinical record. The number of included OSA patients was 3217. The number of patients with OA therapy was 2947. We evaluated 1600 patients for the OA treatment. The patients treated with OA, both male and female, were most commonly in their 50s. In terms of OSA severity, snoring was 2.3%, mild was 38.5%, moderate was 39.9%, and severe was 19.3%. The use of mono bloc appliance was 91.8%, bi bloc appliance was 7.9%, and tongue-retaining device (TRD) was 0.3%. After OA treatment, AHI decreased from 22.4/h to 9.3/h. The AHI reduction rate with OA was 52.0%. The rate of AHI <5 with OA was 35.6%. Adverse reactions developed in 14.7% of the subjects. OA reassessment was conducted for 54.3%. This study revealed the current situation of efficacy and side effects of OA therapy, and the problem that the reassessment rate of OA was low in Japan.
Suggested Citation
Kentaro Okuno & Akifumi Furuhashi & Shuhei Nakamura & Hiroshi Suzuki & Takehiro Arisaka & Hitoshi Taga & Masataka Tamura & Haruto Katahira & Minoru Furuhata & Chisato Iida, 2019.
"Japanese Cross-Sectional Multicenter Survey (JAMS) of Oral Appliance Therapy in the Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-9, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3288-:d:265071
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3288-:d:265071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.