Author
Listed:
- Mimi Mun Yee Tse
(School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)
- Shamay Sheung Mei Ng
(Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)
- Xue Bai
(Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)
- Paul Hong Lee
(School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)
- Raymond Lo
(Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Shatin Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong)
- Daphne Sze Ki Cheung
(School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)
- Kin Cheung
(School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)
- Suey Shuk Yu Yeung
(Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
Abstract
Background: Chronic pain is common among older adults and is associated with adverse physical and psychological outcomes. Given the burden of pain and limited healthcare resources, devising innovative and cost-effective ways of managing chronic pain is of high priority. The aim of this paper is to explore the experiences and perceptions of peer volunteers (PVs) in a peer-led pain management program among nursing home residents in Hong Kong. Methods: Forty-six PVs were recruited and trained to lead a pain management program (PAP). The PAP consisted of one 1 hour session per week for 12 weeks. It included 20 min of physical exercises performed under the supervision of PVs, followed by 30 min of pain management education, including information on pain situations, the impacts of pain, the use of drugs and non-drug strategies for pain management, demonstrations, and return demonstrations of various non-drug pain management techniques. Quantitative data were collected from questionnaires (demographics, pain situation, and pain knowledge) for all PVs. Qualitative data (PVs’ experiences in leading the PAP, their perceived benefits, barriers encountered, and recommendations for improving the PAP) were collected at week 12 (upon completion of the PAP). Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences and content analysis for qualitative data. Results: A total of 46 PVs were recruited (34 females, 74%), with a mean ± SD age of 61.0 ± 5.1 years. Thirty-one of them reported having chronic pain. Before the training, their self-rated pain knowledge was 40.0 ± 20.5 (maximum 100 points) while their actual pain knowledge score was 86.1 ± 10.6 (maximum 100 points). The PVs reported an improvement in their knowledge and skills after leading PAPs. No PVs reported having received any negative comments about their role in leading the PAP but mentioned that they had received feedback on how to improve the program. Conclusions: This study provides further evidence that peer-led pain management programs are feasible and can lead to positive experiences for the PVs. Peer support models are coming into wide use because they show promise in helping patients to manage chronic conditions. Peer volunteers will become important resources in elderly care. The barriers that were identified may lead to improvements in the design and planning of future PAPs.
Suggested Citation
Mimi Mun Yee Tse & Shamay Sheung Mei Ng & Xue Bai & Paul Hong Lee & Raymond Lo & Daphne Sze Ki Cheung & Kin Cheung & Suey Shuk Yu Yeung, 2019.
"Lesson Learned from Peer Volunteers in a Peer-Led Pain Management Program among Nursing Home Residents,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-10, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:17:p:3097-:d:261038
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:17:p:3097-:d:261038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.