IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i16p2989-d259090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Fan

    (Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China)

  • Sheetal Bhurke

    (National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC), University of Southampton Beta House, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK)

  • Guizhen Jia

    (Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Fujian Song

    (Faculty of Medicine & Health Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK)

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aims to describe the characteristics of diabetes research conducted in China and the USA. The study included 800 studies on diabetes mellitus from both countries. Compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were more likely to be laboratory-based primary research (50.5% versus 30.8%), more likely to use animal subjects (47% versus 27.5%), more likely to focused on risk factors (22.7% versus. 14.7%), more likely to be case-controlled studies (17.7% versus 10.0%), and more likely to evaluate pharmacological treatments (36.5% versus 20.7%). Further, compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were less likely to involve patients (42.7% versus 60.7%), less likely to be clinical trials (6.2% versus 14.5%), less likely to be cohort studies (8.8% versus. 26.0%), and less likely to evaluate disease management interventions (3.3% versus 13.3%). Clinical studies in China should be more patient-based to facilitate more effective control and management of diabetes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Fan & Sheetal Bhurke & Guizhen Jia & Fujian Song, 2019. "Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-8, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2989-:d:259090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2989-:d:259090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.