Author
Listed:
- Foteini Alipasali
(Department of Physical Education & Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 62100 Serres, Greece)
- Sophia D. Papadopoulou
(Laboratory of Evaluation of Human Biological Performance, Department of Physical Education & Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
- Ioannis Gissis
(Department of Physical Education & Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 62100 Serres, Greece)
- Georgios Komsis
(Department of Physical Education & Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 62100 Serres, Greece)
- Stergios Komsis
(Department of Physical Education & Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 62100 Serres, Greece)
- Angelos Kyranoudis
(Department of Physical Education & Sport Science, Democritus University of Thrace, 69100 Komotini, Greece)
- Beat Knechtle
(Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland)
- Pantelis T. Nikolaidis
(Exercise Physiology Laboratory, 18450 Nikaia, Greece)
Abstract
The aim of the present trial was to investigate the effect of two stretching programs, a dynamic and a static one, on the sprint ability of recreational volleyball players. The sample consisted of 27 male recreational volleyball players (age 21.6 ± 2.1 years, mean ± standard deviation, body mass 80.3 ± 8.9 kg, height 1.82 ± 0.06 m, body mass index 24.3 ± 2.5 kg.m −2 , volleyball experience 7.7 ± 2.9 years). Participants were randomly divided into three groups: (a) the first performing dynamic stretching exercises three times per week, (b) the second following a static stretching protocol on the same frequency, and (c) the third being the control group, abstaining from any stretching protocol. The duration of the stretching exercise intervention period was 6 weeks, with all groups performing baseline and final field sprinting tests at 4.5 and 9 m. The post-test sprint times were faster in both the 4.5 ( p = 0.027, η 2 = 0.188) and 9 m tests ( p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.605) compared to the pre-test values. A large time × group interaction was shown in both the 4.5 ( p = 0.007, η 2 = 0.341) and 9 m tests ( p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.363) with the static and dynamic stretching groups being faster in the post-test than in the pre-test, whereas no change was found in the control group. The percentage change in the 4.5 m sprint time correlated with volleyball experience ( r = −0.38, p = 0.050), i.e., the longer the volleyball experience, the larger the improvement in the 4.5 m sprint. Thus, it is concluded that both stretching techniques have a positive effect on the velocity of recreational male volleyball players, when performed at a frequency of three times per week for 6 weeks under the same conditions as defined in the study protocol.
Suggested Citation
Foteini Alipasali & Sophia D. Papadopoulou & Ioannis Gissis & Georgios Komsis & Stergios Komsis & Angelos Kyranoudis & Beat Knechtle & Pantelis T. Nikolaidis, 2019.
"The Effect of Static and Dynamic Stretching Exercises on Sprint Ability of Recreational Male Volleyball Players,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-10, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2835-:d:255937
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Amine Atac & Ebrar Atak, 2024.
"The Effect of Stretching Exercises Applied to Caregivers of Children with Development Disabilities on Musculoskeletal Muscle Mobility and Respiratory Function,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-13, October.
- Pantelis T. Nikolaidis & Beat Knechtle, 2021.
"Is It Time for Sports and Health in the Era of Covid-19 Pandemic?,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-3, January.
- Nebojša Trajković & Goran Sporiš & Tomislav Krističević & Špela Bogataj, 2020.
"Effects of Small-Sided Recreational Volleyball on Health Markers and Physical Fitness in Middle-Aged Men,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-10, April.
- Andreas Konrad & Masatoshi Nakamura & David George Behm, 2022.
"The Effects of Foam Rolling Training on Performance Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis including Controlled and Randomized Controlled Trials,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2835-:d:255937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.