IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i15p2754-d254005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Chemical and Thermal Treatments on Control Rhizopus stolonifer Fruit Infection Comparing Tomato Cultivars with Different Sensitivities to Cracking

Author

Listed:
  • Liliana Alfaro-Sifuentes

    (Department of Biology & Geology, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (CeiA3), and CIEMBITAL, University of Almería, E-04120 Almería, Spain)

  • Melchor Juan

    (Laboratory of Phytopathology, Labcolor, Coexphal, Venta el Viso, La Mojonera, E-04746 Almería, Spain)

  • Rosalba Troncoso-Rojas

    (Coordinación de Tecnología de Alimentos de Origen Vegetal, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A. C., Carretera a la Victoria Km. 0.6, Apdo. Postal 1735, Hermosillo, Sonora 83304, Mexico)

  • David Erick Meca

    (Estación Experimental Cajamar. Paraje Las Palmerillas 25, El Ejido, 04710 Almería, Spain)

  • María Antonia Elorrieta

    (Laboratory of Phytopathology, Labcolor, Coexphal, Venta el Viso, La Mojonera, E-04746 Almería, Spain)

  • Juan Luis Valenzuela

    (Department of Biology & Geology, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (CeiA3), and CIEMBITAL, University of Almería, E-04120 Almería, Spain)

Abstract

Tomatoes are among the most important horticultural crops; however, it is estimated that 30% of tomato yield is lost due to postharvest rot due to Rhizopus stolonifer , a fungus which requires lesions to initiate the infectious process. Tomato fruit cracking is a physiopathy which causes significant economic losses, since cracking is the door used by the fungus. In this experiment, 14 cultivars of tomato of different types were used. Fruit sampling was carried out in the middle of the crop cycle, coinciding with the peak of yield; then, the fruits were divided into two groups: one group was inoculated with Rhizopus in order to assess the effectiveness of washing, whilst the other was treated with sterile water. The fruits of each group were divided into lots to be treated with six washing treatments: dipping in hot water at 20, 40 and 60 °C for 20 s; the fruits were then sprayed with the following solutions: 0.6% of Hydrogen Peroxide 23% + Peracetic acid 15%; commercial bleach at 0.5% and 2% of Hydrogen Peroxide 50%. The control sample was not washed. The results show that there was an influence of cultivar on fruit cracking, which was strongly related with Rhizopus infection. Three cultivars were not susceptible to cracking, and therefore, were not sensitive to Rhizopus infection. The effectiveness of different washing treatments of tomato fruits depends on several factors; nonetheless, hot water treatment has been shown to be more effective than the use of chemical products such as commercial bleach or hydrogen peroxide. Another factor, the susceptibility of cultivars to cracking, determines the effectiveness of the washing treatment. The results provide an important basis for making decisions about the washing management of tomato fruits in packaging houses.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliana Alfaro-Sifuentes & Melchor Juan & Rosalba Troncoso-Rojas & David Erick Meca & María Antonia Elorrieta & Juan Luis Valenzuela, 2019. "Effectiveness of Chemical and Thermal Treatments on Control Rhizopus stolonifer Fruit Infection Comparing Tomato Cultivars with Different Sensitivities to Cracking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:15:p:2754-:d:254005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/15/2754/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/15/2754/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:15:p:2754-:d:254005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.