Author
Listed:
- Yu Hwa Pan
(School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 10692, Taiwan
Department of Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10488, Taiwan
Graduate Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33343, Taiwan
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40150, Taiwan)
- His Kuei Lin
(School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 10692, Taiwan
Dental Department, Taipei Medical University, Shuang-Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23557, Taiwan)
- Jerry C-Y Lin
(School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 10692, Taiwan
Department of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA)
- Yung-Szu Hsu
(School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 10692, Taiwan)
- Yi-Fan Wu
(School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 10692, Taiwan)
- Eisner Salamanca
(School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 10692, Taiwan)
- Wei-Jen Chang
(School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 10692, Taiwan
Dental Department, Taipei Medical University, Shuang-Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23557, Taiwan)
Abstract
Objective: To describe remodeling of the mesial and distal marginal bone level around platform-switched (PS) and platform-matched (PM) dental implants that were sandblasted with large grit and etched with acid over a three-year period. Materials and Methods: Digital periapical radiographs were obtained at the following time-points: during Stage I of the surgical placement of dental implants, before loading, immediately after loading (baseline), and one, three, six, 12, and 36 months after loading for measuring the horizontal and vertical marginal bone levels. Results: Sixty implants were successfully osseointegrated during the overall observation period. Vertical marginal bone levels for the PS and PM dental implants were 0.78 ± 0.77 and 0.98 ± 0.81 mm, respectively, whereas the horizontal marginal bone levels for the PS and PM implants were 0.84 ± 0.45 and 0.98 ± 0.68 mm, respectively. During the time leading up to the procedure until 36 months after the procedure, the average vertical marginal bone level resulted in less bone loss for the PS and PM groups—0.96 ± 1.28 and 0.30 ± 1.15 mm, respectively ( p < 0.05). The mean levels of the horizontal marginal bone also showed increases of 0.48 ± 1.01 mm in the PS and 0.37 ± 0.77 mm in the PM groups from the time before loading until 36 months after the procedure. However, these increases were not statistically significant ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: PS dental implants appeared to be more effective than PM implants for minimizing the mean marginal vertical and horizontal marginal bone loss during the three-year period. Regardless of which abutment connection was used, the dental implant in the present retrospective investigation exhibited minimal marginal bone remodeling, thus indicating long-term stability.
Suggested Citation
Yu Hwa Pan & His Kuei Lin & Jerry C-Y Lin & Yung-Szu Hsu & Yi-Fan Wu & Eisner Salamanca & Wei-Jen Chang, 2019.
"Evaluation of the Peri-Implant Bone Level around Platform-Switched Dental Implants: A Retrospective 3-Year Radiographic Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-12, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:14:p:2570-:d:249568
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:14:p:2570-:d:249568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.