Author
Listed:
- Stephane Lopes
(Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute of Engineering, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Lúcia Filipe
(Nursing School of Coimbra, 3046-851 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Rosana Silva
(Nursing School of Coimbra, 3046-851 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Arménio Cruz
(The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3046-851 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Pedro Parreira
(The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3046-851 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Filipa Couto
(The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3046-851 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Rafael Bernardes
(The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3046-851 Coimbra, Portugal)
- João Apóstolo
(The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3046-851 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Luís Roseiro
(Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute of Engineering, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Cândida Malça
(Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute of Engineering, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal)
Abstract
Background: The ageing process involves a natural degeneration of physiological function and can imply life constraints, namely during activities of daily life (ADL). Walking can be strongly affected by strength, gait, and balance changes, which affect quality of life. The quality of life of the older adult is associated with available solutions that contribute to an active and safe ageing process. Most of these solutions involve technical aids that should be adapted to older adults’ conditions. Aim : To identify the advantages and disadvantages of two-wheeled walkers and of two different self-locking systems designed and developed by the authors. Methods : Two studies were performed based on the possible walker combinations used, using a walker with no wheels (classic fixed walker), a two-wheeled walker with self-locking mechanism made of gears and a spring (Approach 1), and a two-wheeled walker with a self-locking mechanism which uses a single spring (Approach 2). These combinations were tested in two quasi-experimental studies with pre–post test design. Results : No significant differences in duration, gait speed, and Expanded Timed Get Up and Go (ETGUG) were found between the walkers, but there was a marginally significant difference in Physiological Cost Index (PCIs), which means that the energetic cost with Approach 1 was greater than that with Approach 2. Users reported a feeling of insecurity and more weight, although no significant differences were observed and they were found to be equivalent in terms of safety. Study 2 found an improvement in duration and gait speed in the ETGUG between the different types of self-locking systems. Conclusions : The PCI is higher in the two-wheeled walker models and with the self-locking mechanism. Approach 2 did not show better conditions of use than the other two walkers, and participants did not highlight its braking system. Although safety is similar among the three walkers, further studies are needed, and the braking system of the two-wheeled walker needs to be improved (Approach 2).
Suggested Citation
Stephane Lopes & Lúcia Filipe & Rosana Silva & Arménio Cruz & Pedro Parreira & Filipa Couto & Rafael Bernardes & João Apóstolo & Luís Roseiro & Cândida Malça, 2019.
"An Innovative Concept for a Walker with a Self-Locking Mechanism Using a Single Mechanical Approach,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1671-:d:230809
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1671-:d:230809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.