Author
Listed:
- Monica Eneriz-Wiemer
(Department of Pediatrics, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Division of General Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)
- Lee M. Sanders
(Division of General Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Center for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)
- Mary McIntyre
(Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA)
- Fernando S. Mendoza
(Division of General Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)
- D. Phuong Do
(Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA)
- C. Jason Wang
(Division of General Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Center for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)
Abstract
To ensure timely appropriate care for low-birth-weight (LBW) infants, healthcare providers must communicate effectively with parents, even when language barriers exist. We sought to evaluate whether non-English primary language (NEPL) and professional in-person interpreter use were associated with differential hospital length of stay for LBW infants, who may incur high healthcare costs. We analyzed data for 2047 infants born between 1 January 2008 and 30 April 2013 with weight <2500 g at one hospital with high NEPL prevalence. We evaluated relationships of NEPL and in-person interpreter use on length of stay, adjusting for medical severity. Overall, 396 (19%) had NEPL parents. Fifty-three percent of NEPL parents had documented interpreter use. Length of stay ranged from 1 to 195 days (median 11). Infants of NEPL parents with no interpreter use had a 49% shorter length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43–0.61) compared to English-speakers. Infants of parents with NEPL and low interpreter use (<25% of hospital days) had a 26% longer length of stay (adjusted IRR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.51). NEPL and high interpreter use (>25% of hospital days) showed a trend for an even longer length of stay. Unmeasured clinical and social/cultural factors may contribute to differences in length of stay.
Suggested Citation
Monica Eneriz-Wiemer & Lee M. Sanders & Mary McIntyre & Fernando S. Mendoza & D. Phuong Do & C. Jason Wang, 2018.
"In-Person Interpreter Use and Hospital Length of Stay among Infants with Low Birth Weight,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-9, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1570-:d:159797
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1570-:d:159797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.