IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i5p947-d145398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in Diabetes Care: Importance of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshifumi Saisho

    (Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 1608582 Tokyo, Japan)

Abstract

The efficacy of diabetes treatment should not be evaluated solely by HbA1c levels as they should also focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as patient satisfaction, wellbeing and quality of life. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) has been developed to assess patient satisfaction with diabetes treatment. DTSQ has been translated into more than 100 languages and is widely used in many countries, since it is relatively easy to answer and is used for both patients with and without medical therapy. Novel therapeutic options, such as insulin analogs, incretin-based therapy and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, have been shown to improve patient satisfaction using DTSQ for assessments. DTSQ is not only used for comparisons between different medications or treatment strategies, but also can be used to assess the quality of diabetes care in clinical settings. This is important as an improvement in treatment satisfaction may enhance patients’ self-efficacy and adherence to therapy, leading to the achievement of long-term stable glycemic control and reduced risk of diabetic complications. In this review, we summarize the current topics in DTSQ, introducing our own experience, and discuss the role of PROs in diabetes treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshifumi Saisho, 2018. "Use of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in Diabetes Care: Importance of Patient-Reported Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-7, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:947-:d:145398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Díez-Fernández & María Dolores Rodríguez-Huerta & Rubén Mirón-González & José Alberto Laredo-Aguilera & Noelia María Martín-Espinosa, 2021. "Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Elena-Daniela Grigorescu & Cristina-Mihaela Lăcătușu & Ioana Crețu & Mariana Floria & Alina Onofriescu & Alexandr Ceasovschih & Bogdan-Mircea Mihai & Laurențiu Șorodoc, 2021. "Self-Reported Satisfaction to Treatment, Quality of Life and General Health of Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Inadequate Glycemic Control from North-Eastern Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:947-:d:145398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.