IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i5p923-d144791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in the Prevalences of Selected Birth Defects in Korea (2008–2014)

Author

Listed:
  • Jung-Keun Ko

    (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Dirga Kumar Lamichhane

    (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Hwan-Cheol Kim

    (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea
    Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Jong-Han Leem

    (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea
    Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

Abstract

Little information is available on the prevalences of birth defects in Korea. The aims of this study were to estimate recent prevalences of selected birth defects and to analyze the prevalence trends of these defects during the period from 2008 to 2014. Prevalences were calculated for 69 major birth defects using health insurance claim data obtained from the Korea National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Prevalence rate ratios were calculated using Poisson regression to analyze trends over the 7-year study period. The overall prevalence of a major birth defect was 446.3 per 10,000 births (95% CI: 444.0–448.6); 470.9 per 10,000 births (95% CI: 467.6–474.2) for males and 420.2 per 10,000 births (95% CI: 417–423.4) for females. The prevalence rates of the most common birth defects over the study period were; septal defect (138.2 per 10,000; 95% CI: 136.9–139.5), congenital hip dislocation (652 per 10,000; 95% CI: 64.1–65.9), and ventricular septal defect (62.62 per 10,000; 95% CI: 61.7–63.5). During the study period, a significant increase in the prevalence of a major birth defect was observed with a prevalence rate ratio (PRR) of 1.091. The strongest trend was observed for renal dysplasia, which had a PRR of 1.275 (95% CI: 1.211–1.343), and upward trends were observed for urogenital anomalies, such as, renal agenesis (PRR 1.102, 95% CI: 1.067–1.138), undescended testis (PRR 1.082, 95% CI: 1.072–1.093) and hypospadias (PRR 1.067, 95% CI: 1.044–1.090). This study shows an overall increase in the prevalences of birth defects, including hypospadias and undescended testis, which are known to be associated with endocrine factors. In the future, standardized birth defect registries should be established to enable these trends to be monitored.

Suggested Citation

  • Jung-Keun Ko & Dirga Kumar Lamichhane & Hwan-Cheol Kim & Jong-Han Leem, 2018. "Trends in the Prevalences of Selected Birth Defects in Korea (2008–2014)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:923-:d:144791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, D.-K. & Mueller, B.A. & Hickok, D.E. & Daling, J.R. & Fantel, A.G. & Checkoway, H. & Weiss, N.S., 1996. "Maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risk of congenital urinary tract anomalies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(2), pages 249-253.
    2. Atta, C.A.M. & Fiest, K.M. & Frolkis, A.D. & Jette, N. & Pringsheim, T. & St Germaine-Smith, C. & Rajapakse, T. & Kaplan, G.G. & Metcalfe, A., 2016. "Global birth prevalence of spina bifida by folic acid fortification status: A systematic review and meta-analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(1), pages 24-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeffrey T. White & Erin Kovar & Tiffany M. Chambers & Kunj R. Sheth & Erin C. Peckham-Gregory & Marisol O’Neill & Peter H. Langlois & Carolina J. Jorgez & Philip J. Lupo & Abhishek Seth, 2019. "Hypospadias Risk from Maternal Residential Exposure to Heavy Metal Hazardous Air Pollutants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Sarah Soyeon Oh & Sunwha Park & Young-Ah You & Yongho Jee & AbuZar Ansari & Soo Min Kim & Gain Lee & Young Ju Kim, 2021. "Prenatal Exposure to Alcohol, Tobacco, and Coffee: Associated Congenital Complications and Adverse Birth Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-8, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fisher, Nirah & Amitai, Yona & Haringman, Miri & Meiraz, Hana & Baram, Nira & Leventhal, Alex, 2005. "The prevalence of smoking among pregnant and postpartum women in Israel: a national survey and review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Eija Häyrynen, Dr. & Kaarina Määttä, Prof. Dr. & Satu Uusiautti, Prof. Dr., 2018. "“Let’s let the students do by themselves” How to activate students with severe physical disability in the classroom?," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 7(1), pages 28-41, January.
    3. Michaela Dellenmark-Blom & Marie Andersson & Konrad M. Szymanski & Charlotta Levén Andréasson & Magdalena Vu Minh Arnell & Sofia Sjöström & Kate Abrahamsson, 2024. "Linguistic, Content and Face Validity of the Swedish Version of a Quality-of-Life Assessment for Children, Teenagers and Adults with Spina Bifida," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:923-:d:144791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.