Author
Listed:
- Adam Gregory Gavarkovs
(Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA)
- Patricia Markham Risica
(Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Department of Epidemiology, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Center for Health Equity Research, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA)
- Donna R. Parker
(Department of Epidemiology, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Memorial Hospital of RI, Center of Primary Care and Prevention, Pawtucket, RI 02904, USA
Department of Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA)
- Ernestine Jennings
(Center for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA)
- Jennifer Mello
(Center for Health Equity Research, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA)
- Maureen Phipps
(Department of Epidemiology, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI 02905, USA)
Abstract
Background: Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) presents substantial health risks for pregnant women and newborn infants. Measurements of ETS include invasive and expensive biochemical tests, as well as less invasive and lower-cost, self-reported exposure and avoidance measures. Better understanding of self-report measures will help to select ETS assessments for evaluation. Methods: This analysis was conducted within the context of a tailored video intervention to reduce tobacco smoking and ETS exposure during pregnancy and after delivery in the control group sample of 147 nonsmoking women. Measurements of salivary cotinine concentration, self-reported ETS exposure, and avoidance behaviors were captured at 32 weeks’ gestation and 6 months postpartum. Results: Salivary cotinine concentration was significantly related to ETS avoidance among pregnant nonsmokers at 32 weeks’ gestation, but not ETS exposure. At 6 months postpartum, both the reported ETS exposure of the infant and maternal avoidance behaviors to reduce her infant’s exposure were associated with the infant’s salivary cotinine concentration. At 32 weeks’ gestation and 6 months postpartum, avoidance behaviors decreased as exposure increased. Discussion: This study suggests that for nonsmoking women during pregnancy, reports of tobacco smoke avoidance are more valid than reports of exposure. After delivery, self-reported ETS exposure or avoidance are associated with each other and the biochemical measurement of salivary cotinine. These results provide researchers and clinicians with evidence to support the inclusion of avoidance behaviors in the selection of ETS measures.
Suggested Citation
Adam Gregory Gavarkovs & Patricia Markham Risica & Donna R. Parker & Ernestine Jennings & Jennifer Mello & Maureen Phipps, 2018.
"Self-Reported Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Avoidance Compared with Cotinine Confirmed Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Pregnant Women and Their Infants,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-8, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:871-:d:143497
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:871-:d:143497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.