IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p816-d142418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of Urban Public Spaces: Intent vs. Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Mikkel Hjort

    (Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Southern University of Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark)

  • W. Mike Martin

    (Architecture Department, University of California-Berkeley, 230Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA 94720–1820, USA)

  • Tom Stewart

    (Human Potential Centre, Auckland University of Technology, AUT Millennium, Room SA225, New Zealand)

  • Jens Troelsen

    (Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Southern University of Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark)

Abstract

This study investigated how two public spaces for sport and recreation were utilized by different user groups, and how this aligned with the initial design objectives for these spaces. Two newly built urban spaces situated in Copenhagen, Denmark, provided the context for this investigation. The System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) was used to examine the physical activity of users in these two urban spaces. The architects responsible for designing each space were interviewed to ascertain the intended target group of each space and to unravel the reasons behind the design decisions. The SOPARC observations revealed that males were more vigorously active than females when using the recreation facilities, and the observed users did not align with the intended target groups. The interviews suggested that design decisions were based on minimal interdisciplinary knowledge, and that expert knowledge was chosen randomly. These findings point to a systematic lack of evidence-based practice when designing sport and recreational facilities. This article has implications for landscape architects and urban planners; a new method must be developed to embed interdisciplinary knowledge in the planning process of future sport and recreation projects. This must be done in a systematic way to make the design process transparent.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikkel Hjort & W. Mike Martin & Tom Stewart & Jens Troelsen, 2018. "Design of Urban Public Spaces: Intent vs. Reality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:816-:d:142418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Dahl Refshauge & Ulrika K. Stigsdotter & Bettina Lamm & Kristin Thorleifsdottir, 2015. "Evidence-Based Playground Design: Lessons Learned from Theory to Practice," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 226-246, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Misagh Mottaghi & Maria Kylin & Sandra Kopljar & Catharina Sternudd, 2021. "Blue-Green Playscapes: Exploring Children’s Places in Stormwater Spaces in Augustenborg, Malmö," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 175-188.
    2. Marie C. Gramkow & Ulrik Sidenius & Gaochao Zhang & Ulrika K. Stigsdotter, 2021. "From Evidence to Design Solution—On How to Handle Evidence in the Design Process of Sustainable, Accessible and Health-Promoting Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Dilek Altun, 2022. "Family Ecology as a Context for Children’s Executive Function Development: the Home Literacy Environment, Play, and Screen Time," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(4), pages 1465-1488, August.
    4. Yalcin Yildirim & Golnaz Keshavarzi & Amanda R. Aman, 2022. "Does play-based experience provide for inclusiveness? A case study of multi-dimensional indicators," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(6), pages 2197-2214, December.
    5. Thomas Morgenthaler & Christina Schulze & Duncan Pentland & Helen Lynch, 2023. "Environmental Qualities That Enhance Outdoor Play in Community Playgrounds from the Perspective of Children with and without Disabilities: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-30, January.
    6. Nazanin Omidvar & Tarah Wright & Karen Beazley & Daniel Seguin, 2019. "Examining Children’s Indoor and Outdoor Nature Exposures and Nature-related Pedagogic Approaches of Teachers at Two Reggio-Emilia Preschools in Halifax, Canada," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 13(2), pages 215-241, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:816-:d:142418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.