IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p723-d140579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concerns about Quadrupole ICP-MS Lead Isotopic Data and Interpretations in the Environment and Health Fields

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Gulson

    (Energy and Environmental Research Centre, Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
    CSIRO Energy Flagship, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia)

  • George D. Kamenov

    (Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32605, USA)

  • William Manton

    (Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Michael Rabinowitz

    (Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA)

Abstract

There has been a massive increase in recent years of the use of lead (Pb) isotopes in attempts to better understand sources and pathways of Pb in the environment and in man or experimental animals. Unfortunately, there have been many cases where the quality of the isotopic data, especially that obtained by quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Q-ICP-MS), are questionable, resulting in questionable identification of potential sources, which, in turn, impacts study interpretation and conclusions. We present several cases where the isotopic data have compromised interpretation because of the use of only the major isotopes 208 Pb/ 206 Pb and 207 Pb/ 206 Pb, or their graphing in other combinations. We also present some examples comparing high precision data from thermal ionization (TIMS) or multi-collector plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS) to illustrate the deficiency in the Q-ICP-MS data. In addition, we present cases where Pb isotopic ratios measured on Q-ICP-MS are virtually impossible for terrestrial samples. We also evaluate the Pb isotopic data for rat studies, which had concluded that Pb isotopic fractionation occurs between different organs and suggest that this notion of biological fractionation of Pb as an explanation for isotopic differences is not valid. Overall, the brief review of these case studies shows that Q-ICP-MS as commonly practiced is not a suitable technique for precise and accurate Pb isotopic analysis in the environment and health fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Gulson & George D. Kamenov & William Manton & Michael Rabinowitz, 2018. "Concerns about Quadrupole ICP-MS Lead Isotopic Data and Interpretations in the Environment and Health Fields," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:723-:d:140579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam Laycock & Simon Chenery & Elizabeth Marchant & Helen Crabbe & Ayoub Saei & Ekaterine Ruadze & Michael Watts & Giovanni S. Leonardi & Tim Marczylo, 2022. "The Use of Pb Isotope Ratios to Determine Environmental Sources of High Blood Pb Concentrations in Children: A Feasibility Study in Georgia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Philippe Glorennec & Aurélia Azema & Séverine Durand & Sophie Ayrault & Barbara Le Bot, 2021. "The Isotopic Signature of Lead Emanations during the Fire at Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-9, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:723-:d:140579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.