IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p714-d140442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Socio-Technical Exploration for Reducing & Mitigating the Risk of Retained Foreign Objects

Author

Listed:
  • Siobhán Corrigan

    (School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland)

  • Alison Kay

    (School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland)

  • Katie O’Byrne

    (School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland)

  • Dubhfeasa Slattery

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons (RSCI) in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
    Medical Professionalism, RCSI and Bons Secours Health System, Dublin 2, Ireland)

  • Sharon Sheehan

    (Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland)

  • Nick McDonald

    (School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland)

  • David Smyth

    (Department of Surgery & Clinical Director Perioperative Services, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland)

  • Ken Mealy

    (Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons (RSCI) in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland)

  • Sam Cromie

    (School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland)

Abstract

A Retained Foreign Object (RFO) is a fairly infrequent but serious adverse event. An accurate rate of RFOs is difficult to establish due to underreporting but it has been estimated that incidences range between 1/1000 and 1/19,000 procedures. The cost of a RFO incident may be substantial and three-fold: (i) the cost to the patient of physical and/or psychological harm; (ii) the reputational cost to an institution and/or healthcare provider; and (iii) the financial cost to the taxpayer in the event of a legal claim. This Health Research Board-funded project aims to analyse and understand the problem of RFOs in surgical and maternity settings in Ireland and develop hospital-specific foreign object management processes and implementation roadmaps. This project will deploy an integrated evidence-based assessment methodology for social-technical modelling (Supply, Context, Organising, Process & Effects/ SCOPE Analysis Cube) and bow tie methodologies that focuses on managing the risks in effectively implementing and sustaining change. It comprises a multi-phase research approach that involves active and ongoing collaboration with clinical and other healthcare staff through each phase of the research. The specific objective of this paper is to present the methodological approach and outline the potential to produce generalisable results which could be applied to other health-related issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Siobhán Corrigan & Alison Kay & Katie O’Byrne & Dubhfeasa Slattery & Sharon Sheehan & Nick McDonald & David Smyth & Ken Mealy & Sam Cromie, 2018. "A Socio-Technical Exploration for Reducing & Mitigating the Risk of Retained Foreign Objects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:714-:d:140442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nick McDonald & Lucy McKenna & Rebecca Vining & Brian Doyle & Junli Liang & Marie E. Ward & Pernilla Ulfvengren & Una Geary & John Guilfoyle & Arwa Shuhaiber & Julio Hernandez & Mary Fogarty & Una Hea, 2021. "Evaluation of an Access-Risk-Knowledge (ARK) Platform for Governance of Risk and Change in Complex Socio-Technical Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-33, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:714-:d:140442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.