IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p594-d138065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification Accuracy of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Assessing Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity in 3–5-Year-Old Children

Author

Listed:
  • Wonwoo Byun

    (Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Jung-Min Lee

    (School of Physical Education, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea)

  • Youngwon Kim

    (Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
    Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CBD 0SP, UK)

  • Timothy A. Brusseau

    (Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

Abstract

This study examined the accuracy of the Fitbit activity tracker (FF) for quantifying sedentary behavior (SB) and varying intensities of physical activity (PA) in 3–5-year-old children. Twenty-eight healthy preschool-aged children (Girls: 46%, Mean age: 4.8 ± 1.0 years) wore the FF and were directly observed while performing a set of various unstructured and structured free-living activities from sedentary to vigorous intensity. The classification accuracy of the FF for measuring SB, light PA (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and total PA (TPA) was examined calculating Pearson correlation coefficients (r), mean absolute percent error (MAPE), Cohen’s kappa ( k ), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC). The classification accuracies of the FF (ROC-AUC) were 0.92, 0.63, 0.77 and 0.92 for SB, LPA, MVPA and TPA, respectively. Similarly, values of kappa, Se, Sp and percentage of correct classification were consistently high for SB and TPA, but low for LPA and MVPA. The FF demonstrated excellent classification accuracy for assessing SB and TPA, but lower accuracy for classifying LPA and MVPA. Our findings suggest that the FF should be considered as a valid instrument for assessing time spent sedentary and overall physical activity in preschool-aged children.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonwoo Byun & Jung-Min Lee & Youngwon Kim & Timothy A. Brusseau, 2018. "Classification Accuracy of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Assessing Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity in 3–5-Year-Old Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:594-:d:138065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunku Kwon & Ryan D. Burns & Youngwon Kim & Yang Bai & Wonwoo Byun, 2021. "Inter-Device Agreement between Fitbit Flex 1 and 2 for Assessing Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Fotini Venetsanou & Kyriaki Emmanouilidou & Konstantinos Soutos & Sofoklis A. Sotiriou & Leire Bastida & Ana Moya & Antonis Kambas, 2020. "Towards a Functional Approach to the Assessment of Daily Life Physical Activity in Children: Are the PAQ-C and Fitbit Flex-2 Technically Adequate?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Wonwoo Byun & Erica Y. Lau & Timothy A. Brusseau, 2018. "Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Wearable Technology-Based Physical Activity Intervention in Preschoolers: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:594-:d:138065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.