IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i3p481-d135589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reanalysis of Epidemiological Investigation of Cancer Risk among People Residing near Nuclear Power Plants in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong-Min Kim

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Cheongju Medical Center, Cheongju 28547, Korea)

  • Myoung-Hee Kim

    (People’s Health Institute, Seoul 07004, Korea)

  • Young-Su Ju

    (Department of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Korea)

  • Seung-sik Hwang

    (Department of Public Health Science, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Mina Ha

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan 31116, Korea)

  • Bong-Kyu Kim

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Kyung Ehi Zoh

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Domyung Paek

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
    Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

Background : A 20-year follow-up study on cancer incidence among people living near nuclear power plants in South Korea ended in 2011 with a finding of significantly, but inconsistently, elevated thyroid cancer risk for females. Reanalysis of the original study was carried out to examine the dose–response relationship further, and to investigate any evidence of detection bias. Methods : In addition to replicating the original Cox proportional hazards models, nested case-control analysis was carried out for all subjects and for four different birth cohorts to examine the effects of excluding participants with pre-existing cancer history at enrollment. The potential for detection bias was investigated using the records of medical utilization and voluntary health checks of comparison groups. Results : The overall risk profile of the total sample was similar to that of the original study. However, in the stratified analysis of four birth cohorts, the cancer risk among people living near nuclear power plants became higher in younger birth cohorts. This was especially true for thyroid cancers of females (hazard ratio (HR) 3.38) and males (HR 1.74), female breast cancers (HR 2.24), and radiation-related cancers (HR 1.59 for males, HR 1.77 for females), but not for radiation-insensitive cancers (HR 0.59 for males, HR 0.98 for females). Based on medical records and health check reports, we found no differences between comparison groups that could have led to detection bias. Conclusions : The overall results suggest elevated risk of radiation-related cancers among residents living near nuclear power plants, controlling for the selective survival effect. This is further supported by the lack of evidence of detection bias and by records of environmental exposure from radiation waste discharge.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong-Min Kim & Myoung-Hee Kim & Young-Su Ju & Seung-sik Hwang & Mina Ha & Bong-Kyu Kim & Kyung Ehi Zoh & Domyung Paek, 2018. "Reanalysis of Epidemiological Investigation of Cancer Risk among People Residing near Nuclear Power Plants in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:481-:d:135589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/3/481/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/3/481/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:481-:d:135589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.