Author
Listed:
- Julian W. Tang
(Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK)
- Elizabeth Hoyle
(Infection Prevention and Control, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK)
- Sammy Moran
(Leicester Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK)
- Manish Pareek
(Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
Infectious Diseases Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK)
Abstract
Air sampling as an aid to infection control is still in an experimental stage, as there is no consensus about which air samplers and pathogen detection methods should be used, and what thresholds of specific pathogens in specific exposed populations (staff, patients, or visitors) constitutes a true clinical risk. This case report used a button sampler, worn or held by staff or left free-standing in a fixed location, for environmental sampling around a child who was chronically infected by a respiratory adenovirus, to determine whether there was any risk of secondary adenovirus infection to the staff managing the patient. Despite multiple air samples taken on difference days, coinciding with high levels of adenovirus detectable in the child’s nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs), none of the air samples contained any detectable adenovirus DNA using a clinically validated diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Although highly sensitive, in-house PCR assays have been developed to detect airborne pathogen RNA/DNA, it is still unclear what level of specific pathogen RNA/DNA constitutes a true clinical risk. In this case, the absence of detectable airborne adenovirus DNA using a conventional diagnostic assay removed the requirement for staff to wear surgical masks and face visors when they entered the child’s room. No subsequent staff infections or outbreaks of adenovirus have so far been identified.
Suggested Citation
Julian W. Tang & Elizabeth Hoyle & Sammy Moran & Manish Pareek, 2018.
"Near-Patient Sampling to Assist Infection Control—A Case Report and Discussion,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-9, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:238-:d:129520
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:238-:d:129520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.