IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i12p2841-d190247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Bioavailability and Translocation of Selected Heavy Metals by Brassica juncea and Spinacea oleracea L for a South African Power Utility Coal Fly Ash

Author

Listed:
  • Aluwani Shiridor Mashau

    (Environmental Remediation and Nanoscience Group, Department of Ecology and Resources Management, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)

  • Mugera Wilson Gitari

    (Environmental Remediation and Nanoscience Group, Department of Ecology and Resources Management, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)

  • Segun Ajayi Akinyemi

    (Environmental Remediation and Geopollution Group, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Private Mail Bag 5363, Ado Ekiti 360001 Nigeria)

Abstract

This study evaluated the physicochemical and mineralogical properties, mobile chemical species bioavailability and translocation in Brassica juncea and Spinacea oleracea L. plants of a South African coal-fired power utility. Coal-fly-ash (CFA) disposal is associated with various environmental and health risks, including air, soil, surface, and groundwater pollution due to the leaching of toxic heavy metals; these ends up in food webs affecting human health, while repeated inhalation causes bronchitis, silicosis, hair loss, and lung cancer. The morphology and chemical and mineralogical composition of CFA were determined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and X-ray diffraction, respectively. In pot-culture experiments, S. oleracea L. and B. juncea plants were grown in three sets of pots containing CFA (Set 1), soil (Set 2), and a mixture of CFA plus soil at a ratio of 1:1 (50% CFA: 50% soil, Set 3), while no plants were grown in Set 4 as a control for the leachate samples. SEM showed that the surface morphology of CFA has a lower degree of sphericity with the irregular agglomerations of many particles. XRF results revealed that CFA contains 43.65%, 22.68%, and 10.89% of SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3, and Fe 2 O 3, respectively, which indicates that CFA is an aluminosilicate material. X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that CFA contains mullite as a major phase, followed by quartz mineral phases. Chemical species such as B, Ba, Mo, and Cr were occurring at higher concentrations in the leachates for most weeks in the pot-culture experiments, especially for CFA and soil + CFA growth media. However, there was a common trend for all growth media of chemical-species concentrations declining with time, which might have been caused by plant uptake or wash-off with water during irrigation; even for the growth media as well, where no plants were grown. Chemical species, such as Fe, Mn, B, Ba, and Zn, accumulated highly in most parts of the plant species. However, B. juncea showed higher potential to accumulate chemical species as compared to S. oleracea L. Bioconcentration and translocation factors (BF and TF) showed that B. juncea was the most effective in terms of bioconcentration and translocation of most of the chemical species. This indicates that B. juncea has potential in application for the phytoremediation of CFA dumps, and could contribute to the remediation of CFA dumps and the reduction of potential health and environmental impact associated with CFA.

Suggested Citation

  • Aluwani Shiridor Mashau & Mugera Wilson Gitari & Segun Ajayi Akinyemi, 2018. "Evaluation of the Bioavailability and Translocation of Selected Heavy Metals by Brassica juncea and Spinacea oleracea L for a South African Power Utility Coal Fly Ash," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:12:p:2841-:d:190247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/12/2841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/12/2841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Shabani & M. H. Sayadi, 2012. "Evaluation of heavy metals accumulation by two emergent macrophytes from the polluted soil: an experimental study," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 91-98, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yeni Rodríguez & Bélgica Maudier & Erick Zagal & Pedro Hernández, 2019. "Effects of Wood Ash on Nutrients and Heavy Metal(oid)s Mobility in an Ultisol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Svetlana Ivanova & Anna Vesnina & Nataly Fotina & Alexander Prosekov, 2022. "An Overview of Carbon Footprint of Coal Mining to Curtail Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuangjia Li & Zijian Lun & Lin Zhao & Qilong Zhu & Yansheng Gu & Manzhou Li, 2017. "Screening for Autochthonous Phytoextractors in a Heavy Metal Contaminated Coal Mining Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Chee Kong Yap & Weiyun Chew & Khalid Awadh Al-Mutairi & Salman Abdo Al-Shami & Rosimah Nulit & Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim & Koe Wei Wong & Alireza Riyahi Bakhtiari & Moslem Sharifinia & Wan Hee Cheng & Hideo , 2021. "Invasive Weed Asystasia gangetica as a Potential Biomonitor and a Phytoremediator of Potentially Toxic Metals: A Case Study in Peninsular Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Cristina Hegedus & Simona-Nicoleta Pașcalău & Luisa Andronie & Ancuţa-Simona Rotaru & Alexandra-Antonia Cucu & Daniel Severus Dezmirean, 2023. "The Journey of 1000 Leagues towards the Decontamination of the Soil from Heavy Metals and the Impact on the Soil–Plant–Animal–Human Chain Begins with the First Step: Phytostabilization/Phytoextraction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-49, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:12:p:2841-:d:190247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.