IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i12p2623-d184939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soft Tissue Contour Impression with Analogic or Digital Work Flow: A Case Report

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Canullo

    (Private Practice, Via Nizza, 46, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Andrea Di Domenico

    (Private Practice, Via Benincasa, 11, 84013 Cava de’ Tirreni, Italy)

  • Fabio Marinotti

    (Private Practice, Via Nizza, 46, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Maria Menini

    (Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), Implant and Prosthetic Dentistry Unit, University of Genoa, Ospedale S. Martino (Pad. 4), L. Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

  • Paolo Pesce

    (Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), Implant and Prosthetic Dentistry Unit, University of Genoa, Ospedale S. Martino (Pad. 4), L. Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

Abstract

Purpose: Transferring precise information to the dental laboratory is one of the key factors to achieving clinical success. The aim of the present study was to describe classical and digital work-flows used to rehabilitate an implant with a convergent collar in the aesthetic zone following the BOPT (biologically oriented preparation technique) approach and to report the three years follow-up outcomes of two patients rehabilitated following such procedures. Materials and methods: Two central incisors of two different patients were rehabilitated with a tissue-level implant with a convergent collar and, after a provisional and healing phase, one implant was “impressed” using a classical workflow and one using a digital one. The primary outcome measured was the mean bone loss. An intraoral radiograph was taken at crown delivery and at the three years follow-up visit. Secondary Esthetic outcomes pre-op and post-op were evaluated using the PES (pink esthetic score). Results: At the three years follow-up visit, radiographic analysis showed no signs of bone resorption. For the analogic procedure, the pre-and post-op PES scores were 8, whereas for the digital procedure the pre-op PES score was 4 and a post-op score of 9 was obtained. Conclusions: classical and digital work flows succeeded in giving precise and complete anatomical information of implant position, including the soft tissue contour. Minimum bone loss and an esthetic success were obtained in both procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Canullo & Andrea Di Domenico & Fabio Marinotti & Maria Menini & Paolo Pesce, 2018. "Soft Tissue Contour Impression with Analogic or Digital Work Flow: A Case Report," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-7, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:12:p:2623-:d:184939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/12/2623/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/12/2623/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:12:p:2623-:d:184939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.