Author
Listed:
- Ju-Won Kim
(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14066, Korea
Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)
- Jong-Cheol Kim
(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14066, Korea
Mir Dental Hospital, Daegu 41940, Korea)
- Kyeong-Jun Cheon
(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14066, Korea
Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)
- Seoung-Won Cho
(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14066, Korea
Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)
- Young-Hee Kim
(Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
Department of Image Science in Dentistry, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14066, Korea)
- Byoung-Eun Yang
(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14066, Korea
Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)
Abstract
Background : Favourable occlusal interdigitation and an optimized position of the mandibular condyle after surgery are essential for obtaining favourable results. The position of the condyle is determined during the operation. However, it is difficult to maintain the condyle’s original position post-surgery despite the efforts of the surgeons. Indeed, a degree of rotation of the condyle is unavoidable, since it is difficult to verify whether the condyle is positioned correctly during surgery. Purpose : To maximize contact between the bone segments, the condyle was rotated around the vertical axis using surgical simulations. We examined changes to the condyle-fossa relationship after comparing virtual surgery to actual surgery. Methods : From 2015 to 2017, 20 patients were diagnosed with skeletal malocclusion and participated in computer-aided surgical simulation before undergoing orthognathic surgery. In the simulation, the mandibular condyles were rotated around the vertical axis, and the proximal segments were fixed to the distal segments using a customized miniplate and positioning device during actual surgery. This study investigated the relationship between the condyle and fossa using cone-beam computed tomography for several different time periods (preoperative (T0), virtual surgery (Tv), postoperative three days (T1) and one year (T2)). Results : The coronal and sagittal view exhibited significant differences in the mean values between T1and T0, Tv, and T2 for all joint spaces. As a result of the distance, the mean value of T2 in both the superior joint space (JS) and the lateral JS was significantly higher than that of Tv. In contrast, the mean value of Tv in the medial JS was significantly higher than that of T2. Moreover, the mean value of T2 on the axial plane was significantly larger than the values of Tv and T1. The mean value of T0 was also significantly larger than those of Tv and T1, and the mean value of Tv was larger than that of T1. Although the condyle was rotated, it exhibited a tendency to return to its preoperative position. There was no statistically significant difference in functional evaluation between T0 and T2. Conclusion : Our method of using yaw control for the condyle during virtual surgery and transferring this technique to the actual surgery can improve the conventional surgical technique by positioning the proximal segment in a pre-planned position, thus achieving optimal results.
Suggested Citation
Ju-Won Kim & Jong-Cheol Kim & Kyeong-Jun Cheon & Seoung-Won Cho & Young-Hee Kim & Byoung-Eun Yang, 2018.
"Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation for Yaw Control of the Mandibular Condyle and Its Actual Application to Orthognathic Surgery: A One-Year Follow-Up Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2380-:d:178659
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2380-:d:178659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.