IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i10p2282-d176385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between Online and Offline Price of Tobacco Products Using Novel Datasets

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Opazo Breton

    (Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Univeristy of Nottingham/UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK)

  • John Britton

    (Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Univeristy of Nottingham/UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK)

  • Yue Huang

    (Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Univeristy of Nottingham/UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK)

  • Ilze Bogdanovica

    (Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Univeristy of Nottingham/UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK)

Abstract

Price of tobacco products has traditionally been relevant both for the industry, to respond to policy changes, and for governments, as an effective tobacco control measure. However, monitoring prices across a wide range of brands and brand variants requires access to expensive commercial sales databases. This study aims to investigate the comparability of average tobacco prices from two commercial sources and an in-house monitoring database which provides daily data in real time at minimal cost. We used descriptive and regression analysis to compare the monthly average numbers of brands, brand variants, products and prices of cigarettes and hand-rolling tobacco using commercial data from Nielsen Scantrack and Kantar Worldpanel , and an online price database (OPD) created in Nottingham, for the period from May 2013 to February 2017. There were marked differences in the number of products tracked in the three data sources. Nielsen was the most comprehensive and Kantar Worldpanel the least. Though average prices were very similar between the three datasets, Nottingham OPD prices were the highest and Kantar Worldpanel the lowest. However, regression analysis demonstrated that after adjustment for differences in product range, price differences between the datasets were very small. After allowing for differences in product range these data sources offer representative prices for application in price research. Online price tracking offers an inexpensive and near real-time alternative to the commercial datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Opazo Breton & John Britton & Yue Huang & Ilze Bogdanovica, 2018. "Comparison between Online and Offline Price of Tobacco Products Using Novel Datasets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2282-:d:176385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cigarettes; prices; tobacco;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2282-:d:176385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.