IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i10p2131-d172434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Occupational and Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals Share Predictors in the Field of Psychosocial Working Conditions? Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study in German University Hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Anke Wagner

    (Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
    Equal contribution.)

  • Antje Hammer

    (Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany
    Equal contribution.)

  • Tanja Manser

    (Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany
    FHNW School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Riggenbachstrasse 16, 4600 Olten, Switzerland)

  • Peter Martus

    (Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital of Tübingen, Silcherstraße 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Heidrun Sturm

    (Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Monika A. Rieger

    (Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany)

Abstract

Background: In the healthcare sector, a comprehensive safety culture includes both patient care-related and occupational aspects. In recent years, healthcare studies have demonstrated diverse relationships between aspects of psychosocial working conditions, occupational, and patient safety culture. The aim of this study was to consider and test relevant predictors for staff’s perceptions of occupational and patient safety cultures in hospitals and whether there are shared predictors. From two German university hospitals, 381 physicians and 567 nurses completed a questionnaire on psychosocial working conditions, occupational, and patient safety culture. Two regression models with predictors for occupational and patient safety culture were conceptually developed and empirically tested. In the Occupational Safety Culture model, job satisfaction (β = 0.26, p ≤ 0.001), work‒privacy conflict (β = −0.19, p ≤ 0.001), and patient-related burnout (β = −0.20, p ≤ 0.001) were identified as central predictors. Important predictors in the Patient Safety Culture model were management support for patient safety (β = 0.24, p ≤ 0.001), supervisor support for patient safety (β = 0.18, p ≤ 0.001), and staffing (β = 0.21, p ≤ 0.001). The two models mainly resulted in different predictors. However, job satisfaction and leadership seem to play an important role in both models and can be used in the development of a comprehensive management of occupational and patient safety culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Anke Wagner & Antje Hammer & Tanja Manser & Peter Martus & Heidrun Sturm & Monika A. Rieger, 2018. "Do Occupational and Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals Share Predictors in the Field of Psychosocial Working Conditions? Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study in German University Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2131-:d:172434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anke Wagner & Martina Michaelis & Edwin Luntz & Andrea Wittich & Matthias Schrappe & Constanze Lessing & Monika A. Rieger, 2018. "Assessment of Patient and Occupational Safety Culture in Hospitals: Development of a Questionnaire with Comparable Dimensions and Results of a Feasibility Study in a German University Hospital," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Yi-Chuan Chen & Yue-Liang Leon Guo & Wei-Shan Chin & Nai-Yun Cheng & Jiune-Jye Ho & Judith Shu-Chu Shiao, 2019. "Patient–Nurse Ratio is Related to Nurses’ Intention to Leave Their Job through Mediating Factors of Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Anke Wagner & Ladina Schöne & Monika A. Rieger, 2020. "Determinants of Occupational Safety Culture in Hospitals and other Workplaces—Results from an Integrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Katarzyna Zebrak & Naomi Yount & Joann Sorra & Theresa Famolaro & Laura Gray & Deborah Carpenter & Andrew Caporaso, 2022. "Development, Pilot Study, and Psychometric Analysis of the AHRQ Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ (SOPS ® ) Workplace Safety Supplemental Items for Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Kapo Wong & Alan Hoi Shou Chan, 2018. "Emerging Issues in Occupational Safety and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-4, December.
    6. Jocélia Maria de Azevedo Bringel & Isabel Abreu & Maria-Cláudia Mendes Caminha Muniz & Paulo César de Almeida & Maria-Raquel G. Silva, 2023. "Health Professionals’ Chronotype Association with Salivary Cortisol and Occupational Stress in Neonatal Intensive Care Units," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2131-:d:172434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.