IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i10p2109-d171903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phthalate Exposure from Drinking Water in Romanian Adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Rose O. Sulentic

    (Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA)

  • Irina Dumitrascu

    (Environmental Health Center, Strada Busuiocului 58, 400240 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Nicole C. Deziel

    (Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
    These authors denotes equivalent contribution as senior authors.)

  • Anca E. Gurzau

    (Environmental Health Center, Strada Busuiocului 58, 400240 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    These authors denotes equivalent contribution as senior authors.)

Abstract

Phthalates are plastic softeners that have been linked to several adverse health outcomes. The relative contributions of different sources to phthalate exposure in populations in different regions and at different life stages is unclear. We examined the relationships between water consumption, consumer product use, and phthalate exposure among 40 adolescents (20 males, 20 females) in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Interviewers administered a questionnaire about drinking water consumption and use of phthalate-containing consumer products. Four common phthalates were measured in representative samples of participants’ municipal drinking water and consumed bottled water using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Urine samples were collected from participants and analyzed for the corresponding phthalate metabolites. Relationships between different exposure measures were assessed using nonparametric tests (Spearman rank correlation coefficients and the Kruskal–Wallis test). Diisobutyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were commonly detected in bottled water, but generally not the municipal drinking water samples. Mono- n -butyl phthalate (MnBP) was the most commonly detected urinary metabolite (detected in 92.5% of participants) and had the highest maximum concentration (1139.77 µg/g creatinine). We did not identify any statistically significant associations between water consumption or consumer product use practices and urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in our adolescent group, and directions of correlation coefficients differed by individual phthalate compound. While phthalate exposure was widespread, these results highlight the challenges in examining phthalate exposure determinants and emphasize the need for further investigation into understanding exposure sources and potential health risks from chronic low-level exposures.

Suggested Citation

  • Rose O. Sulentic & Irina Dumitrascu & Nicole C. Deziel & Anca E. Gurzau, 2018. "Phthalate Exposure from Drinking Water in Romanian Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2109-:d:171903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Cullen & David Evans & Chris Griffin & Padraig Burke & Rory Mannion & Damien Burns & Andrew Flanagan & Ann Kellegher & Greet Schoeters & Eva Govarts & Pierre Biot & Ludwine Casteleyn & Argel, 2017. "Urinary Phthalate Concentrations in Mothers and Their Children in Ireland: Results of the DEMOCOPHES Human Biomonitoring Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kingsley Ezechukwu Okpara & Khamphe Phoungthong & Iwekumo Agbozu & Edeh Edwin-Isotu & Kuaanan Techato, 2022. "Phthalate Esters in Tap Water, Southern Thailand: Daily Exposure and Cumulative Health Risk in Infants, Lactating Mothers, Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2109-:d:171903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.