IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i7p777-d104598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Vitro and In Vivo Control of Secondary Bacterial Infection Caused by Leishmania major

Author

Listed:
  • Hany M. Yehia

    (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Home Economics, Helwan University, Cairo 11221, Egypt)

  • Ebtesam M. Al-Olayan

    (Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
    Chair Vaccines Research of Infectious Diseases, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia)

  • Manal F. El-Khadragy

    (Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
    Chair Vaccines Research of Infectious Diseases, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
    Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo 11790, Egypt)

  • Dina M. Metwally

    (Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
    Chair Vaccines Research of Infectious Diseases, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
    Parasitology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 12878, Egypt)

Abstract

Bacterial infections of cutaneous leishmaniasis cause skin ulcers on mice, resulting in increased tissue deterioration, and these infections can be controlled with liquid allicin. To isolate and identify the incidences of real secondary bacterial infections in mice, we performed the current study by injecting mice ( n = 50) with Leishmania major. L. major infections were initiated by an intramuscular injection of 0.1 mL Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI 1640 media/mouse (10 7 promastigote/mL)). Scarring appeared 2–6 weeks after injection, and the bacteria were isolated from the skin ulcer tissues. Allicin (50 µL/mL) and ciprofloxacin (5 μg; Cip 5) were used for controlling L. major and bacteria. One hundred samples from skin ulcers of mice were examined, and 200 bacterial colonies were isolated. Forty-eight different genera and species were obtained and identified by Gram staining and physiological and biochemical characterization using identification kits. All samples were positive for secondary bacterial infections. Of the isolates, 79.16% were identified as Gram-negative bacteria, and 28.84% were identified as Gram-positive bacteria; only one yeast species was found. Interestingly, pure allicin liquid at a concentration 50 µL/mL exhibited antibacterial activity against a wide range of Gram-negative and some Gram-positive bacteria, in addition to yeast, and was 71.43% effective. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of all genera and species were determined using 15 different antibiotics. Allicin (50 µL/mL) and Cip 5 were the most effective against L. major and 92.30% of isolated bacteria. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was the most resistant bacterium to the tested antibiotics with a survival rate of 73.33%, and it exhibited resistance to allicin.

Suggested Citation

  • Hany M. Yehia & Ebtesam M. Al-Olayan & Manal F. El-Khadragy & Dina M. Metwally, 2017. "In Vitro and In Vivo Control of Secondary Bacterial Infection Caused by Leishmania major," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:7:p:777-:d:104598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/7/777/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/7/777/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:7:p:777-:d:104598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.