IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i6p597-d100520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Factors Associated with Risk Assessment Competencies of Public Health Emergency Responders

Author

Listed:
  • Jiejing Hao

    (Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiaojiao Ren

    (Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Qunhong Wu

    (Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
    The Innovation Center for Social Risk Governance in Health, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Yanhua Hao

    (Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
    The Innovation Center for Social Risk Governance in Health, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Hong Sun

    (Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China)

  • Ning Ning

    (Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
    The Innovation Center for Social Risk Governance in Health, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Ding Ding

    (Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China)

Abstract

This study aimed to better understand the current situation of risk assessment and identify the factors associated with competence of emergency responders in public health risk assessment. The participants were selected by a multi-stage, stratified cluster sampling method in Heilongjiang Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The questionnaires that measured their perceptions on risk assessment competences were administered through the face-to-face survey. A final sample of 1889 staff was obtained. Of this sample, 78.6% of respondents rated their own risk assessment competences as “relatively low”, contrasting with 21.4% rated as “relatively high”. Most of the respondents (62.7%) did not participate in any risk assessment work. Only 13.7% and 42.7% of respondents reported participating in risk assessment training and were familiar with risk assessment tools. There existed statistical significance between risk assessment-related characteristics of respondents and their self-rated competences scores. Financial support from the government and administrative attention were regarded as the important factors contributing to risk assessment competences of CDC responders. Higher attention should be given to risk assessment training and enhancing the availability of surveillance data. Continuous efforts should be made to remove the financial and technical obstacles to improve the competences of risk assessment for public health emergency responders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiejing Hao & Jiaojiao Ren & Qunhong Wu & Yanhua Hao & Hong Sun & Ning Ning & Ding Ding, 2017. "Identifying Factors Associated with Risk Assessment Competencies of Public Health Emergency Responders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:6:p:597-:d:100520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/6/597/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/6/597/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:6:p:597-:d:100520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.