IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i3p323-d93661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Eco-Safety Assessment of Glyoxal-Containing Cellulose Ether on Freeze-Dried Microbial Strain, Cyanobacteria, Daphnia , and Zebrafish

Author

Listed:
  • Chang-Beom Park

    (Environmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Europe, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany)

  • Min Ju Song

    (Lotte Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd., Ulsan 44714, Korea)

  • Nak Woon Choi

    (Lotte Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd., Ulsan 44714, Korea)

  • Sunghoon Kim

    (Lotte Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd., Ulsan 44714, Korea)

  • Hyun Pyo Jeon

    (Environmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Europe, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany)

  • Sanghun Kim

    (Environmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Europe, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany)

  • Youngjun Kim

    (Environmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Europe, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the aquatic-toxic effects of glyoxal-containing cellulose ether with four different glyoxal concentrations (0%, 1.4%, 2.3%, and 6.3%) in response to global chemical regulations, e.g., European Union Classification, Labeling and Packaging (EU CLP). Toxicity tests of glyoxal-containing cellulose ether on 11 different microbial strains, Microcystis aeruginosa , Daphnia magna , and zebrafish embryos were designed as an initial stage of toxicity screening and performed in accordance with standardized toxicity test guidelines. Glyoxal-containing cellulose ether showed no significant toxic effects in the toxicity tests of the 11 freeze-dried microbial strains, Daphnia magna , and zebrafish embryos. Alternatively, 6.3% glyoxal-containing cellulose ether led to a more than 60% reduction in Microcystis aeruginosa growth after 7 days of exposure. Approximately 10% of the developmental abnormalities (e.g., bent spine) in zebrafish embryos were also observed in the group exposed to 6.3% glyoxal-containing cellulose ether after 6 days of exposure. These results show that 6.3% less glyoxal-containing cellulose ether has no acute toxic effects on aquatic organisms. However, 6.3% less glyoxal-containing cellulose ether may affect the health of aquatic organisms with long-term exposure. In order to better evaluate the eco-safety of cellulosic products containing glyoxal, further studies regarding the toxic effects of glyoxal-containing cellulose ether with long-term exposure are required. The results from this study allow us to evaluate the aquatic-toxic effects of glyoxal-containing cellulosic products, under EU chemical regulations, on the health of aquatic organisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang-Beom Park & Min Ju Song & Nak Woon Choi & Sunghoon Kim & Hyun Pyo Jeon & Sanghun Kim & Youngjun Kim, 2017. "An Eco-Safety Assessment of Glyoxal-Containing Cellulose Ether on Freeze-Dried Microbial Strain, Cyanobacteria, Daphnia , and Zebrafish," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:3:p:323-:d:93661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/3/323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/3/323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Hartung & Costanza Rovida, 2009. "Chemical regulators have overreached," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7259), pages 1080-1081, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Scharmüller & Verena C. Schreiner & Ralf B. Schäfer, 2020. "Standartox: Standardizing Toxicity Data," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:3:p:323-:d:93661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.