IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i10p1274-d116077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generally Recognized as Safe: Uncertainty Surrounding E-Cigarette Flavoring Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Clara G. Sears

    (Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
    American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation & Addiction Center, Dallas, TX 75231, USA)

  • Joy L. Hart

    (Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
    American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation & Addiction Center, Dallas, TX 75231, USA)

  • Kandi L. Walker

    (Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
    American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation & Addiction Center, Dallas, TX 75231, USA)

  • Rose Marie Robertson

    (American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation & Addiction Center, Dallas, TX 75231, USA
    American Heart Association, Dallas, TX 75231, USA)

Abstract

Despite scientific uncertainty regarding the relative safety of inhaling e-cigarette aerosol and flavorings, some consumers regard the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) designation as evidence of flavoring safety. In this study, we assessed how college students’ perceptions of e-cigarette flavoring safety are related to understanding of the GRAS designation. During spring 2017, an online questionnaire was administered to college students. Chi-square p -values and multivariable logistic regression were employed to compare perceptions among participants considering e-cigarette flavorings as safe and those considering e-cigarette flavorings to be unsafe. The total sample size was 567 participants. Only 22% knew that GRAS designation meant that a product is safe to ingest, not inhale, inject, or use topically. Of participants who considered flavorings to be GRAS, the majority recognized that the designation meant a product is safe to ingest but also considered it safe to inhale. Although scientific uncertainty on the overall safety of flavorings in e-cigarettes remains, health messaging can educate the public about the GRAS designation and its irrelevance to e-cigarette safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara G. Sears & Joy L. Hart & Kandi L. Walker & Rose Marie Robertson, 2017. "Generally Recognized as Safe: Uncertainty Surrounding E-Cigarette Flavoring Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-4, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1274-:d:116077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1274-:d:116077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.