IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i2p180-d63217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM 2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Tianhai Cheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Xingfa Gu

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Hao Chen

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Ying Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Fengjie Zheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Kunshen Xiang

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Satellite remote sensing is of considerable importance for estimating ground-level PM 2.5 concentrations to support environmental agencies monitoring air quality. However, most current studies have focused mainly on the application of MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) to predict PM 2.5 concentrations, while PARASOL AOD, which is sensitive to fine-mode aerosols over land surfaces, has received little attention. In this study, we compared a linear regression model, a quadratic regression model, a power regression model and a logarithmic regression model, which were developed using PARASOL level 2 AOD collected in China from 18 January 2013 to 10 October 2013. We obtained R (correlation coefficient) values of 0.64, 0.63, 0.62, and 0.57 for the four models when they were cross validated with the observed values. Furthermore, after all the data were classified into six levels according to the Air Quality Index (AQI), a low level of statistical significance between the four empirical models was found when the ground-level PM 2.5 concentrations were greater than 75 μg/m 3 . The maximum R value was 0.44 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model), and the minimum R value was 0.28 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model) when the PM 2.5 concentrations were less than 75 μg/m 3 . We also discussed uncertainty sources and possible improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Guo & Tianhai Cheng & Xingfa Gu & Hao Chen & Ying Wang & Fengjie Zheng & Kunshen Xiang, 2016. "Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM 2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:180-:d:63217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:180-:d:63217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.